The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SiTuATion AT THE SouRCE: SouTH AfRiCA<br />
Number of horns<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
1981<br />
1980<br />
1983<br />
1982<br />
1986<br />
1985<br />
1984<br />
1988<br />
1987<br />
1990<br />
1989<br />
1992<br />
1991<br />
1994<br />
1993<br />
1997<br />
1996<br />
1995<br />
2000<br />
1999<br />
1998<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2004<br />
2003<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
2008<br />
2007<br />
Figure 12 Number of White <strong>Rhino</strong> horns exported from trophy hunts in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> based on CITES export<br />
permit data, 1980-2010 (where “trophy” is assumed to represent two horns)<br />
2010<br />
2009<br />
has been reported, <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s White <strong>Rhino</strong> population has continued to experience an unbroken<br />
record of population increase every time a national level assessment has been undertaken. True to<br />
form, the 2010 country population estimate reported to the IUCN/SSC <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Rhino</strong> Specialist Group<br />
meeting was the highest to date for White <strong>Rhino</strong> in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> (Knight, 2011).<br />
Provincial patterns in sport hunting<br />
Data presented at Parliamentary Hearings in Cape Town in January 2011 about <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s rhino<br />
poaching crisis provide interesting insight into provincial patterns for the sport hunting of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s.<br />
In all provinces, more rhino hunting permits were issued in 2011 than 2010, with the exception of the<br />
Free State. North West and Limpopo provinces issued the greatest number of hunting permits in both<br />
years (Figure 13). Concerns have been raised in a number of forums regarding the standards of implementation<br />
of national legislation relating to rhino activities in North West province. It has also been alleged<br />
that North West province has issued permits to hunt individual rhinos that would not normally be<br />
regarded as “trophy bulls”, including females and younger animals, possibly as a consequence of excessive<br />
off-take of trophy bulls.<br />
Incentives for rhino ownership<br />
From 2008 through October 2011, turnover from sales of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s by the three biggest selling organizations<br />
in the country (two conservation authorities, EKZNW and SANParks, and one private company,<br />
Vleissentraal) totalled just over ZAR236.3 million (approximately USD35.5 million) (R. Emslie, in litt. to<br />
TRAFFIC, 2012). In theory, the rise in the price of rhino hunts since 2008 has allowed the hunting industry<br />
to make unprecedented profits as rhino sale values at the country’s auctions have not increased commensurably.<br />
In practice, however, the impact of rhino poaching on the number of rhinos available for<br />
sale, as well as an emerging public outcry against rhino hunting in general, has had a negative impact on<br />
the actual potential for State conservation authorities to generate financial resources from rhino sales. On<br />
14 July 2009, SANParks Chief Executive Dr David Mabunda said, “We need to dispel the confusion created in<br />
recent media reports between the sale of rhinos and hunting in and outside national parks” (Mabunda, 2009).<br />
SANParks is guided in its decision to sell or distribute White <strong>Rhino</strong>s and other wildlife by Clause 55(2)<br />
(b) of the Protected Areas Act, 57 of 2003 (as amended) which states:<br />
<strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n National Parks may, in managing national parks, sell, exchange or donate any animal,<br />
plant, or other organism occurring in a park, or purchase, exchange or otherwise acquire any indigenous<br />
species which it may consider desirable to reintroduce into a specific park.<br />
<strong>The</strong> decisions by SANParks to sell White <strong>Rhino</strong>s are scientifically determined, based on population<br />
growth, sex and age structure, spatial use, natural dispersal, resource distribution and population<br />
dynamics. At that time the removal rate of rhinos for live sales had no detectable consequences on<br />
population growth and, as Dr Mabunda pointed out:<br />
SANParks, by selling or donating rhinos, is assisting in the process of re-colonisation of the range<br />
in the country and outside. It should be noted that it would be foolhardy if <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> were to have its<br />
only rhino population residing in the Kruger, because we run the danger of losing it should there be a<br />
major outbreak of disease or rampant poaching. We would be sitting ducks (Mabunda, 2009).<br />
Since that time, the number of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s illegally killed in KNP has steadily increased year on year.<br />
More recently, SANParks officials have stated that there will most likely be a serious reduction in, if not<br />
an end to, sales of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s from Kruger in the future due to the impact of poaching on rhino<br />
numbers and population structure in the park. In fact, very few, if any, White <strong>Rhino</strong>s will be sold by<br />
SANParks in 2012 (M. Knight, pers. comm., 2012). <strong>The</strong> notion that current and future poaching levels<br />
are impacting the population to the extent that it may no longer be able to sustain any more removals<br />
is a growing concern. This could lead to a marked reduction in income generated from live game sales<br />
by SANParks to undertake protected area management activities and to purchase new land for conservation<br />
purposes. Potentially, there could be major opportunity costs to SANParks’ broad conservation<br />
mandate if it were to lose the revenue that is presently generated by the sustainable removal of White<br />
<strong>Rhino</strong> for wildlife sales.<br />
Similarly, White <strong>Rhino</strong> sales have been the biggest contributor to total revenue earned by Ezemvelo KZN<br />
Wildlife (EKZNW) at their annual live and catalogue game auctions, accounting for 75% of total turnover<br />
from 2008 to July 2011 (Friedmann et al., 2011). In January 2011, however, the institution received much<br />
media criticism over the sale of a trophy hunt of a White <strong>Rhino</strong> bull for ZAR960 150. This tender was<br />
advertised at the request of the KwaMduku Community, which co-manages the Makhasa Community<br />
Conservation Area with EKZNW.<br />
Figure 13 Number of hunting permits issued for sport hunting of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s in the nine provinces of <strong>South</strong><br />
<strong>Africa</strong> in 2010 and 2011 (data from M. Knight)<br />
50 the south africa <strong>–</strong> viet nam rhino horn trade nexus TRAFFIC 51<br />
Number of permits issued<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
North West<br />
Limpopo<br />
KwaZulu-Natal<br />
Eatsern Cape<br />
Northern Cape<br />
Free State<br />
Mpumalanga<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
Gauteng<br />
Western Cape