30.06.2013 Views

The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF

The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF

The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SiTuATion AT THE SouRCE: SouTH AfRiCA<br />

Number of horns<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

1981<br />

1980<br />

1983<br />

1982<br />

1986<br />

1985<br />

1984<br />

1988<br />

1987<br />

1990<br />

1989<br />

1992<br />

1991<br />

1994<br />

1993<br />

1997<br />

1996<br />

1995<br />

2000<br />

1999<br />

1998<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2004<br />

2003<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

2008<br />

2007<br />

Figure 12 Number of White <strong>Rhino</strong> horns exported from trophy hunts in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> based on CITES export<br />

permit data, 1980-2010 (where “trophy” is assumed to represent two horns)<br />

2010<br />

2009<br />

has been reported, <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s White <strong>Rhino</strong> population has continued to experience an unbroken<br />

record of population increase every time a national level assessment has been undertaken. True to<br />

form, the 2010 country population estimate reported to the IUCN/SSC <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Rhino</strong> Specialist Group<br />

meeting was the highest to date for White <strong>Rhino</strong> in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> (Knight, 2011).<br />

Provincial patterns in sport hunting<br />

Data presented at Parliamentary Hearings in Cape Town in January 2011 about <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s rhino<br />

poaching crisis provide interesting insight into provincial patterns for the sport hunting of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s.<br />

In all provinces, more rhino hunting permits were issued in 2011 than 2010, with the exception of the<br />

Free State. North West and Limpopo provinces issued the greatest number of hunting permits in both<br />

years (Figure 13). Concerns have been raised in a number of forums regarding the standards of implementation<br />

of national legislation relating to rhino activities in North West province. It has also been alleged<br />

that North West province has issued permits to hunt individual rhinos that would not normally be<br />

regarded as “trophy bulls”, including females and younger animals, possibly as a consequence of excessive<br />

off-take of trophy bulls.<br />

Incentives for rhino ownership<br />

From 2008 through October 2011, turnover from sales of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s by the three biggest selling organizations<br />

in the country (two conservation authorities, EKZNW and SANParks, and one private company,<br />

Vleissentraal) totalled just over ZAR236.3 million (approximately USD35.5 million) (R. Emslie, in litt. to<br />

TRAFFIC, 2012). In theory, the rise in the price of rhino hunts since 2008 has allowed the hunting industry<br />

to make unprecedented profits as rhino sale values at the country’s auctions have not increased commensurably.<br />

In practice, however, the impact of rhino poaching on the number of rhinos available for<br />

sale, as well as an emerging public outcry against rhino hunting in general, has had a negative impact on<br />

the actual potential for State conservation authorities to generate financial resources from rhino sales. On<br />

14 July 2009, SANParks Chief Executive Dr David Mabunda said, “We need to dispel the confusion created in<br />

recent media reports between the sale of rhinos and hunting in and outside national parks” (Mabunda, 2009).<br />

SANParks is guided in its decision to sell or distribute White <strong>Rhino</strong>s and other wildlife by Clause 55(2)<br />

(b) of the Protected Areas Act, 57 of 2003 (as amended) which states:<br />

<strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n National Parks may, in managing national parks, sell, exchange or donate any animal,<br />

plant, or other organism occurring in a park, or purchase, exchange or otherwise acquire any indigenous<br />

species which it may consider desirable to reintroduce into a specific park.<br />

<strong>The</strong> decisions by SANParks to sell White <strong>Rhino</strong>s are scientifically determined, based on population<br />

growth, sex and age structure, spatial use, natural dispersal, resource distribution and population<br />

dynamics. At that time the removal rate of rhinos for live sales had no detectable consequences on<br />

population growth and, as Dr Mabunda pointed out:<br />

SANParks, by selling or donating rhinos, is assisting in the process of re-colonisation of the range<br />

in the country and outside. It should be noted that it would be foolhardy if <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> were to have its<br />

only rhino population residing in the Kruger, because we run the danger of losing it should there be a<br />

major outbreak of disease or rampant poaching. We would be sitting ducks (Mabunda, 2009).<br />

Since that time, the number of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s illegally killed in KNP has steadily increased year on year.<br />

More recently, SANParks officials have stated that there will most likely be a serious reduction in, if not<br />

an end to, sales of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s from Kruger in the future due to the impact of poaching on rhino<br />

numbers and population structure in the park. In fact, very few, if any, White <strong>Rhino</strong>s will be sold by<br />

SANParks in 2012 (M. Knight, pers. comm., 2012). <strong>The</strong> notion that current and future poaching levels<br />

are impacting the population to the extent that it may no longer be able to sustain any more removals<br />

is a growing concern. This could lead to a marked reduction in income generated from live game sales<br />

by SANParks to undertake protected area management activities and to purchase new land for conservation<br />

purposes. Potentially, there could be major opportunity costs to SANParks’ broad conservation<br />

mandate if it were to lose the revenue that is presently generated by the sustainable removal of White<br />

<strong>Rhino</strong> for wildlife sales.<br />

Similarly, White <strong>Rhino</strong> sales have been the biggest contributor to total revenue earned by Ezemvelo KZN<br />

Wildlife (EKZNW) at their annual live and catalogue game auctions, accounting for 75% of total turnover<br />

from 2008 to July 2011 (Friedmann et al., 2011). In January 2011, however, the institution received much<br />

media criticism over the sale of a trophy hunt of a White <strong>Rhino</strong> bull for ZAR960 150. This tender was<br />

advertised at the request of the KwaMduku Community, which co-manages the Makhasa Community<br />

Conservation Area with EKZNW.<br />

Figure 13 Number of hunting permits issued for sport hunting of White <strong>Rhino</strong>s in the nine provinces of <strong>South</strong><br />

<strong>Africa</strong> in 2010 and 2011 (data from M. Knight)<br />

50 the south africa <strong>–</strong> viet nam rhino horn trade nexus TRAFFIC 51<br />

Number of permits issued<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

North West<br />

Limpopo<br />

KwaZulu-Natal<br />

Eatsern Cape<br />

Northern Cape<br />

Free State<br />

Mpumalanga<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

Gauteng<br />

Western Cape

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!