The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
The South Africa – Viet Nam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus (PDF ... - WWF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
situation at the source: south africa<br />
<strong>The</strong> Asian syndicates recruit and orchestrate the movements of a highly fluid network of couriers and<br />
“mules” to move rhino horns out of <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. A large proportion of this activity appears focused on<br />
air passengers travelling from southern <strong>Africa</strong> to <strong>South</strong>east Asia. For example, several <strong>Viet</strong>namese students<br />
registered to study within <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> have been arrested trying to traffic rhino horn out of the<br />
country’s international airports on return to their homelands. <strong>Rhino</strong> horn seizures have also been<br />
made from <strong>Viet</strong>namese travellers from Maputo international airport in Mozambique. In some instances,<br />
the syndicate’s dealers also have overt links to the diplomatic community, including commercial<br />
alliances with diplomatic personnel, access to vehicles bearing diplomatic plates for the risk-free movement<br />
of rhino horn within the country and, possibly, the use of a diplomatic pouch to move contraband<br />
to home markets (see “<strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy personnel” below).<br />
Whilst other Asian nationals, particularly Chinese, appear to be deeply involved in the acquisition and<br />
smuggling of abalone and elephant ivory in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, the <strong>Viet</strong>namese community appears to have<br />
the tightest grip on the illicit rhino horn trade, a trend that has increased markedly in recent years. It is<br />
commonly believed that at least 70 <strong>Viet</strong>namese nationals have been accorded permanent residency status<br />
in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> and some of these individuals have been identified in rhino horn crime. For example,<br />
law enforcement officers believe that at least half of the 24 poached rhinos during 2006 had an<br />
overt <strong>Viet</strong>namese connection, and the majority of rhino horn cases occurring in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> during<br />
2004 to 2006 that link to foreign nationals involved suspects acting on behalf of <strong>Viet</strong>namese citizens<br />
(R. Taylor, in litt. to TRAFFIC, 2009). To date, <strong>Viet</strong>namese within <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> continue to be strongly<br />
implicated in the illegal trade in rhino horn and poaching activities.<br />
<strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy personnel<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy in Pretoria, <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s administrative capital city, has been repeatedly implicated<br />
in illicit rhino horn trade. <strong>The</strong> involvement of Embassy personnel first came to light when <strong>Viet</strong><br />
<strong>Nam</strong>’s Commercial Attaché, Khanh Toan Nguyen, was arrested on 1 April 2006 with two rhino horns, as<br />
well as diamonds and large sums of cash. Under interrogation, this individual allegedly indicated that he<br />
had used a diplomatic bag to move rhino horns to <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong> on previous occasions. <strong>The</strong> invocation of<br />
diplomatic immunity prevented prosecution, but it has been reported that Khanh Toan Nguyen was<br />
“recalled and disciplined” from <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> (Anon., 2008b). Another press account in 2008 reported:<br />
“Two years ago, Commercial Attaché Khanh Toan, at the <strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>, was detected to<br />
have connections to rhino horn smuggling and he was punished” (Anon., 2008a). <strong>The</strong>re is concern within lawenforcement<br />
circles that this individual may have re-entered <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> on a non-diplomatic passport<br />
on at least one occasion since his initial arrest (R. Taylor, in litt. to TRAFFIC, 2009).<br />
Another <strong>Viet</strong>namese diplomat identified as “counselor Pham Cong Dung” 1 was also implicated in another<br />
rhino horn seizure case involving 18 kg found in a vehicle at a casino in Northern Cape province sometime<br />
in 2008 (Anon., 2008a). A <strong>Viet</strong>namese citizen using the name “Pham Cong Hang” undertook at least<br />
two rhino hunts in North West province in 2005 (D. Newton, pers. comm., 2010).<br />
<strong>The</strong> most sensational and public case, however, involved Vu Moc Anh, the Embassy’s First Secretary, who<br />
was filmed by the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n Broadcasting Corporation’s “50/50”, a weekly investigative journalism<br />
programme, apparently conducting a rhino horn transaction right in front of the <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong> Embassy in<br />
Pretoria in September 2008 (AFP, 2008; Anon., 2008b). Aired on national television two months later, an<br />
incriminating film sequence showed “Mrs Moc Anh handing rhino horns to a known smuggler... After the<br />
smuggler took the horns from her and put them into the trunk, Mrs Moc Anh can be seen heading back to the<br />
Embassy smiling” (Anon., 2008b). It was also reported that, at the time Vu Moc Anh conducted her rhino<br />
horn transaction outside the Embassy, the “car of Embassy Counselor Pham Cong Dzung ... is seen parked on<br />
the other side of the road, with a <strong>Viet</strong>namese standing next to it. It is unknown why the car of Counselor Dzung<br />
was there at that time and place (while most Embassy cars were parked inside)” (Anon., 2008b).<br />
In the wake of the uproar that followed, this female diplomat was immediately re-called to <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong>,<br />
where the country’s Foreign Ministry felt compelled to issue a statement indicating that it “will strictly<br />
punish any violation related to wildlife trafficking” (Anon., 2008). In an interview with a <strong>Viet</strong>namese journalist,<br />
<strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong>’s Ambassador at the time, Mr. Tran Duy Thi, characterized the action as “stemming from pure<br />
greed” and commented that it was “not just a private act, it is one that has repercussion on the Embassy and the<br />
1 This name is spelled Pham Cong Dzung in another article; see Anon., 2008b.<br />
<strong>Viet</strong>namese embassy employee.<br />
image of <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong> itself” (Anon., 2008b). Ambassador Thi also reported that “Mr Dzung is on leave in<br />
<strong>Viet</strong>nam. We have requested that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs summon him for explanation” (Anon., 2008b).<br />
In fact, it remains unclear what subsequently happened to two of the three <strong>Viet</strong>namese diplomats who have<br />
been arrested or otherwise implicated in illicit rhino horn trade. In the case of Vu Moc Anh, the Ministry of<br />
Foreign Affairs has reported in a response to the Wildlife Conservation Society’s <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong> office:<br />
Regarding the case of Vu Moc Anh, right after <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n press reported that <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> broadcasting<br />
television had filmed Moc Anh in rhino horn dealing, Ministry of Foreign Affairs had recalled Moc<br />
Anh back to the country for explanation and clarification. Moc Anh confirmed to be recorded while helping<br />
a rhino horn dealer review his papers… Up to now, there has been no evidence on Moc Anh’s involvement<br />
in rhino horn dealing in both <strong>Viet</strong>nam and <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> (Tran Quang Tuyen, Deputy Head,<br />
Press and Information Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in litt. to Wildlife Conservation<br />
Society, 14 March 2012).<br />
It is believed that Vu Moc Anh is now back in <strong>Africa</strong> at a <strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy in a neighbouring country.<br />
Concerning the other two individuals, it remains unknown if they were ever punished or lost their<br />
jobs working for <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong>’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is also worth noting that <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s<br />
Department of International Relations and Co-operation has, for the most part, publicly remained<br />
silent on these instances of diplomatic complicity in illegal rhino horn trade. <strong>The</strong> value of current trade<br />
relations and historical ties with <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong>, which was an early supporter of the struggle for liberation<br />
in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> and the now-ruling <strong>Africa</strong>n National Congress (ANC) party, has seemingly trumped the<br />
conservation of the country’s premier flagship species.<br />
<strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>’s law-enforcement community generally expected that direct Embassy complicity in the<br />
rhino horn trade would dissipate in the wake of the embarrassing exposure by the “50/50” television<br />
programme. In fact, on at least two subsequent occasions in 2009, <strong>Viet</strong>namese Embassy vehicles were<br />
allegedly involved in the movement of rhino horn within the country, including in the Eastern Cape<br />
and Mpumalanga provinces (R. Taylor, pers. comm., 2009). With diplomatic plates conferring immunity<br />
from “stop and search” operations, it appears that individuals who are not diplomats themselves<br />
gained access to official Embassy vehicles to potentially transport rhino horns within the country.<br />
82 the south africa <strong>–</strong> viet nam rhino horn trade nexus TRAFFIC 83<br />
5050/SABC2