14.07.2013 Views

Action Research A Methodology for Change and Development

Action Research A Methodology for Change and Development

Action Research A Methodology for Change and Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

Organizational <strong>Development</strong><br />

in Higher Education 1<br />

What are the processes <strong>for</strong> managing change in higher education? How<br />

does an organization with traditions of academic freedom respond to a new<br />

government policy <strong>for</strong> teacher education? Can action research support the<br />

processes of change more effectively if senior managers <strong>and</strong> professors carry<br />

out action research into their own role as change agents? In 1989, while I<br />

was still working on the PALM Project but aware that my contract would be<br />

coming to an end the following year, I heard about the newly published<br />

Trotter Report on In<strong>for</strong>mation Technology in Initial Teacher Education<br />

(DES 1989a) at the Association <strong>for</strong> IT in Teacher Education (ITTE) conference.<br />

The Trotter committee had been set up after an education minister<br />

had been embarrassed by roars of laughter when he announced at a conference<br />

that newly qualified teachers, skilled in using in<strong>for</strong>mation technology<br />

(IT), would be able to take the lead when they took up their first teaching<br />

posts in schools. The report confirmed suspicions that the provision of<br />

training in how to use IT <strong>for</strong> pre-service teachers was generally poor,<br />

‘patchy’ at best. Reading the report in detail I found that it included a recommendation<br />

that ‘NCET should take steps to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> broaden the<br />

advice <strong>and</strong> assistance that it offers to initial teacher education institutions,<br />

especially in the area of staff development’ (DES 1989a: 22). Knowing a lot<br />

about the challenges <strong>and</strong> possibilities that the IT innovation was posing <strong>for</strong><br />

schools, I was interested in looking at the same innovation in the very different<br />

context of teacher education. I went home <strong>and</strong> wrote a proposal to<br />

NCET outlining an action research project to explore how to support the<br />

development of IT in teacher education. I received no response <strong>for</strong> several<br />

months. The Trotter report attracted considerable interest among policy<br />

makers however, <strong>and</strong> as a result, new guidelines <strong>for</strong> teacher education produced<br />

by the Council <strong>for</strong> Accreditation in Teacher Education (CATE)<br />

included requirements <strong>for</strong> all newly qualified teachers to be able to:<br />

1 I would like to thank the 14 members of the Project INTENT team with whom I worked <strong>for</strong><br />

their enormous contribution to the ideas contained in this chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!