19.07.2013 Views

orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org

orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org

orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116<br />

The era of lIberalIsm<br />

“Paz, educación y prosperidad material”<br />

(= ‘Peace, education <strong>and</strong> material prosperity’)<br />

Slogan of the liberal reform <strong>in</strong> Guatemala, 1871<br />

“The immense ideological power of the Church<br />

was a notorious characteristic <strong>in</strong> the formation of<br />

Central American society… The establishment of<br />

secular power was slow <strong>and</strong> difficult; a first attempt<br />

was made <strong>in</strong> the second half of the XVIII century,<br />

under the Bourbons of enlightened Spa<strong>in</strong>. But one has<br />

to wait until the end of the XIX century to observe a<br />

moderate laic triumph: this is the liberal era, the era of<br />

positivism, of education controlled by the State <strong>and</strong> the<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itive consecration of freedom of religion (Pérez<br />

Brignoli, 2000: 27)”. “... the fight between liberals <strong>and</strong><br />

conservatives (clericals) fills the history of Central<br />

America <strong>in</strong> the second half of the century...” (Halper<strong>in</strong><br />

Donghi, 2001: 258).<br />

In Guatemala the liberal revolution triumphed<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1871, dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the figure of president Justo<br />

Ruf<strong>in</strong>o Barrios, who was responsible for a radical<br />

agrarian reform <strong>and</strong> the expropriation of ecclesiastical<br />

possessions. In 1876 liberal ideas ga<strong>in</strong>ed strength <strong>in</strong><br />

El Salvador, dur<strong>in</strong>g the presidency of Rafael Zaldívar<br />

(1876-1885) <strong>and</strong> under strong Guatemalan <strong>in</strong>fluence.<br />

Nicaragua <strong>and</strong> Honduras were an exception, with<br />

reforms that were frustrated or <strong>in</strong>complete. While<br />

Walker’s defeat <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua was followed by more<br />

than thirty years of conservative governments, regional<br />

fragmentation, difficulties <strong>in</strong> communications <strong>and</strong><br />

backwardness h<strong>in</strong>dered <strong>in</strong> Honduras the consolidation<br />

of the State. In Costa Rica, the liberal reforms <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

<strong>in</strong> the forties by president Braulio Carrillo were<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued by president José María Castro Madriz, who<br />

fought for public education <strong>and</strong> for the freedom of<br />

the press, <strong>and</strong> by the ‘progressive authoritarianism’ of<br />

dictator Tomás Guardia (1870-1882). The first public<br />

schools <strong>and</strong> the first universities of Central America<br />

were founded dur<strong>in</strong>g those years.<br />

“After most of Lat<strong>in</strong> America achieved <strong>in</strong>dependence<br />

from Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the early n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, foreign<br />

naturalists began to visit the new republics, as part<br />

of a flood of foreign soldiers, m<strong>in</strong>ers, eng<strong>in</strong>eers,<br />

adventurers, missionaries <strong>and</strong> others. The botany<br />

practiced by these foreign naturalists was essentially<br />

LANKESTERIANA<br />

LANKESTERIANA 9(1—2), August 2009. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2009.<br />

extractive. They extracted botanically significant plants<br />

<strong>in</strong> much the same way that foreign corporations such<br />

as the United Fruit Company extracted bananas from<br />

Central America… By the late n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, the<br />

most important herbaria of Lat<strong>in</strong> American plants were<br />

to be found <strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>and</strong> North America… Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> the last quarter of the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, however,<br />

many Lat<strong>in</strong> American countries began to produce<br />

their own botanical <strong>in</strong>ventories <strong>and</strong> national floras.<br />

The grow<strong>in</strong>g official <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the natural world<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cides with the liberal era <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America that<br />

lasted roughly from 1870 to 1930. National botanical<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories appealed to Lat<strong>in</strong> America’s liberal elites<br />

for ideological <strong>and</strong> practical reasons. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the liberal<br />

era, national governments pursued the goals of ‘order<br />

<strong>and</strong> progress’, enlist<strong>in</strong>g science <strong>and</strong> technology to<br />

help rationalize <strong>and</strong> modernize the state, the economy,<br />

<strong>and</strong> society. They pursued economic growth through<br />

the export of tropical commodities – rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial commodities such as rubber <strong>and</strong> henequen<br />

to luxury foods such as coffee, sugar <strong>and</strong> bananas.<br />

This meant that dur<strong>in</strong>g the liberal era many Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

American economies -<strong>and</strong> by extension the states-<br />

depended heavily upon plants… The leaders <strong>in</strong> each<br />

country began to take an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> botany that offered<br />

the possibility of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the production of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

export crops <strong>and</strong> of discover<strong>in</strong>g new ones. Many Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

American governments established or revived national<br />

botanical gardens, agricultural experiment stations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> natural history museums, whose research agendas<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded survey<strong>in</strong>g the nation’s plants, compil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

national herbaria <strong>and</strong>, most significantly, produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

national floras” (McCook, 2002: 514-515).<br />

Liberal ideas also led to the creation of private<br />

gardens <strong>and</strong> collections, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leisure with<br />

scientific <strong>in</strong>terests. In the history of the <strong>orchids</strong> of<br />

Central America the legendary orchid hunter began to<br />

be displaced by the scientific collector. Although great<br />

quantities of plants where still collected <strong>and</strong> sent to<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> later to the United States, the shipments of<br />

herbarium specimens began to outnumber those of live<br />

plants. A further contribution to this development were<br />

the improvement of methods for the reproduction of<br />

<strong>orchids</strong> from seed <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>, which began <strong>in</strong> 1849 <strong>and</strong><br />

the production of the first hybrids by John Dom<strong>in</strong>y <strong>in</strong><br />

1854. “Gradually […] the <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> imported species<br />

waned as commercial success <strong>in</strong> orchid hybridization

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!