orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org
orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org
orchids and orchidology in central america. 500 ... - lankesteriana.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ossenbaCh — Orchids <strong>and</strong> <strong>orchidology</strong> <strong>in</strong> Central America<br />
-1893) 17 , work<strong>in</strong>g for Low, collected <strong>in</strong> Mexico<br />
between 1835 <strong>and</strong> 1840, especially <strong>in</strong> the region of<br />
Veracruz, discover<strong>in</strong>g an important number of new<br />
species of Orchidaceae: Laelia barkeriana Knowles<br />
& Westc. (‘Plant cultivated by G. Barker, sent to<br />
him by J. Henchman from the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Jalapa’),<br />
Oncidium luridum var. henchmannii Knowles &<br />
Westc. (Henchmann s.n.), Maxillaria henchmannii<br />
Hook. (Henchmann s.n.), Maxillaria cucullata<br />
L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘a native of Equ<strong>in</strong>octial America, whence<br />
it is said to have been brought by Mr. Henchman’)<br />
(Fig. 24C), Humboldtia octomerioides (L<strong>in</strong>dl.)<br />
Kuntze (Henchmann s.n.), <strong>and</strong> Stanhopea tigr<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Bateman ex L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘Henchman s.n., 1835, Habitat<br />
<strong>in</strong> Mexico, propè urbem Xalapam’). He also worked<br />
for Ge<strong>org</strong>e Barker <strong>and</strong> had been before <strong>in</strong> Venezuela,<br />
from where we know of at least one collection,<br />
Chysis aurea L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘<strong>in</strong> the valley of Cumanacoa,<br />
<strong>in</strong> Venezuela, Mr. Henchman s.n.’).<br />
Much later, <strong>in</strong> 1864, Capta<strong>in</strong> John M. Dow mentions<br />
a collector by the name of Macgee, who collected<br />
<strong>orchids</strong> for Low <strong>in</strong> Guatemala, but we have no other<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about him (Letter from Dow to Sk<strong>in</strong>ner,<br />
Feb. 20, 1864).<br />
The genus Barkeria was first described by Knowles<br />
<strong>and</strong> Westcott <strong>in</strong> 1838 <strong>and</strong> named <strong>in</strong> honour of Ge<strong>org</strong>e<br />
Barker (1776-1845) of Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, Engl<strong>and</strong>, who<br />
had imported a plant from Mexico. Barker was a<br />
pioneer <strong>in</strong> import<strong>in</strong>g <strong>orchids</strong>, ma<strong>in</strong>ly from Mexico,<br />
among which many new species were discovered.<br />
A few of them are: Trichopilia tortilis L<strong>in</strong>dl. (G.<br />
Barker s.n., Mexico), Pleurothallis (=Restrepiella)<br />
ophiocephala L<strong>in</strong>dl. (Mexico, Loddiges & Barker<br />
s.n.), Odontoglossum cordatum L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘Ge<strong>org</strong>e<br />
Barker s.n., flowered <strong>in</strong> cultivation, orig<strong>in</strong>ally from<br />
Mexico’), Microstylis excavata L<strong>in</strong>dl. (Mexico, Mr.<br />
Barker s.n.), <strong>and</strong> Laelia furfuracea L<strong>in</strong>dl. (Karw<strong>in</strong>ski,<br />
Oaxaca). Barker is undoubtedly an important figure<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>orchids</strong> from our region to<br />
Europe, <strong>in</strong> the early years after the <strong>in</strong>dependence<br />
of the Central American countries from Spa<strong>in</strong>. “As<br />
a botanist, Mr. Barker was much dist<strong>in</strong>guished. He<br />
bestowed considerable attention on the cultivation of<br />
orchidaceous plants, of which he had a collection that<br />
is believed to have been almost unique, <strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
was unsurpassed <strong>in</strong> value by that of any private<br />
horticulturist <strong>in</strong> Europe” (Urban, 1846: 324-325).<br />
John Ross (?—?), who collected <strong>orchids</strong> between<br />
1837-1840 <strong>in</strong> Mexico, sent many plants to Barker,<br />
among them several species of Odontoglossum for<br />
which Schlechter, <strong>in</strong> 1916, proposed the name of<br />
Rossioglossum <strong>in</strong> his honor (Schlechter, 1916: 153).<br />
The name was formally published as a new genus by<br />
Garay <strong>and</strong> Kennedy <strong>in</strong> 1976. Another species named<br />
for him was Odontoglossum rossii L<strong>in</strong>dl., today<br />
Rhynchostele rossii (L<strong>in</strong>dl.) Soto Arenas y Salazar<br />
(‘A charm<strong>in</strong>g plant, sent to Mr. Barker from Mexico<br />
by his collector Mr. Ross, after whom it is named’).<br />
“Ross started <strong>in</strong> 1837, but his collection did not reach<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> till the follow<strong>in</strong>g year. It <strong>in</strong>cluded the beautiful<br />
Odontoglossum rossii <strong>and</strong> Peristeria (Ac<strong>in</strong>eta) barkeri,<br />
the latter be<strong>in</strong>g discovered <strong>in</strong> a dark rav<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the<br />
neighbourhood of Xalapa” (Anonymous, 1931: 364).<br />
Other collections by Ross <strong>in</strong>clude Peristeria barkeri<br />
Bateman (Ross s.n., Jalapa), Gale<strong>and</strong>ra baueri L<strong>in</strong>dl.<br />
(‘Ross s.n., Mexico’), Laelia majalis L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘Habitat<br />
<strong>in</strong> Mexico - Schiede, Hartweg, Ross’), Epidendrum<br />
aloifolium L. <strong>and</strong> Chysis laevis L<strong>in</strong>dl. (‘Habitat <strong>in</strong><br />
Mexico - Ross’).<br />
The British naval expeditions to the coasts of<br />
Central America, the most important be<strong>in</strong>g those of<br />
H.M. S. Conway (1822), H.M.S. Blossom (1827) <strong>and</strong> of<br />
H.M.S. Sulphur (1836), had undoubtedly also scientific<br />
purposes, but their ma<strong>in</strong> goal was the geographical<br />
exploration <strong>and</strong> the construction of reliable maps<br />
prepar<strong>in</strong>g for a future dom<strong>in</strong>ation of the region <strong>and</strong> the<br />
control of the canal routes.<br />
The decade which began <strong>in</strong> 1840 “is the epoch of<br />
maximum English power <strong>in</strong> Central America. Great<br />
Brita<strong>in</strong> would try to confront the grow<strong>in</strong>g power of<br />
the United States <strong>and</strong> both nations would choose the<br />
border region between Costa Rica <strong>and</strong> Nicaragua as the<br />
ground where they would test their forces...” (Obregón<br />
Quesada, 1993: 75). Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, who already had a<br />
stronghold <strong>in</strong> Belize, pretended <strong>in</strong> addition the control<br />
of the access to the San Juan river.<br />
“A new period of activity set <strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
almost unbroken for many years; but few of the<br />
numerous travelers had received a scientific tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />
hence the botanical results were by no means so<br />
satisfactory as they might have been. Indeed, the<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>cipal object of many of these travelers was the<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduction of liv<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong>to European gardens”<br />
(Hemsley, 1887: 123).<br />
LANKESTERIANA 9(1—2), August 2009. © Universidad de Costa Rica, 2009.<br />
61