2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University
2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University
2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2006</strong>] ARBITRATION: THE BASICS 31<br />
If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator from the first list, either can<br />
request the agency to send another list of arbitrators. The AAA rules<br />
provide that the agency may make the appointment if the first list does<br />
not prompt the appointment of an arbitrator. 134 Most arbitration agencies<br />
will permit two lists to be used. If the parties cannot agree to an<br />
arbitrator after the second list is sent, the agency will appoint an<br />
arbitrator. 135<br />
However the parties set up the method of choosing the arbitrator, it<br />
is important to note that, in arbitration, “[t]he arbitrator is the decisive<br />
element. . . . his or her ability, expertness, fairness and impartiality are at<br />
the base of the arbitration process.” 136 The arbitrator decides the<br />
outcome of the case; thus, it is important for parties to take the time to<br />
decide if one or three arbitrators will be best for their potential dispute.<br />
D. Notification Requirements<br />
Once the parties have decided on the arbitrator(s), the arbitration<br />
agency notifies the arbitrator that he or she has been chosen. The<br />
American Arbitration Association sends a written confirmation letter<br />
acceptance of an arbitrator to serve.<br />
Id.<br />
134. AAA Rules, supra note 37, R-11. If the parties cannot decide on an<br />
arbitrator from the first list, “the AAA shall have the power to make the<br />
appointment from among other members of the National Roster without the<br />
submission of additional lists.” Id.<br />
135. The rules for appointing arbitrators vary according to the agency utilized.<br />
See ICC Rules, supra note 84, art. 8. According to the ICC rules:<br />
Where the parties have agreed that the dispute shall be settled by a sole arbitrator,<br />
they may, by agreement, nominate the sole arbitrator for confirmation. If the parties<br />
fail to nominate a sole arbitrator . . . the sole arbitrator shall be appointed by the<br />
Court.<br />
Id. See also Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, supra note 132,<br />
§ 1404.11. The FMCS rules state that:<br />
If the parties do not agree on an arbitrator from the first panel, the OAS will furnish<br />
a second and third panel to the parties upon joint request and payment of an<br />
additional fee. Requests for a second or third panel should be accompanied by a<br />
brief explanation as to why the previous panel(s) was inadequate. If parties are<br />
unable to agree on a selection after having received three panels, the OAS will<br />
make a direct appointment upon joint request.<br />
Id.<br />
136. GABRIEL WILNER, DOMKE ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 24-1 (Larry<br />
Edmonson ed., Thomson West 2003).