19.07.2013 Views

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2006</strong>] ARBITRATION: THE BASICS 31<br />

If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator from the first list, either can<br />

request the agency to send another list of arbitrators. The AAA rules<br />

provide that the agency may make the appointment if the first list does<br />

not prompt the appointment of an arbitrator. 134 Most arbitration agencies<br />

will permit two lists to be used. If the parties cannot agree to an<br />

arbitrator after the second list is sent, the agency will appoint an<br />

arbitrator. 135<br />

However the parties set up the method of choosing the arbitrator, it<br />

is important to note that, in arbitration, “[t]he arbitrator is the decisive<br />

element. . . . his or her ability, expertness, fairness and impartiality are at<br />

the base of the arbitration process.” 136 The arbitrator decides the<br />

outcome of the case; thus, it is important for parties to take the time to<br />

decide if one or three arbitrators will be best for their potential dispute.<br />

D. Notification Requirements<br />

Once the parties have decided on the arbitrator(s), the arbitration<br />

agency notifies the arbitrator that he or she has been chosen. The<br />

American Arbitration Association sends a written confirmation letter<br />

acceptance of an arbitrator to serve.<br />

Id.<br />

134. AAA Rules, supra note 37, R-11. If the parties cannot decide on an<br />

arbitrator from the first list, “the AAA shall have the power to make the<br />

appointment from among other members of the National Roster without the<br />

submission of additional lists.” Id.<br />

135. The rules for appointing arbitrators vary according to the agency utilized.<br />

See ICC Rules, supra note 84, art. 8. According to the ICC rules:<br />

Where the parties have agreed that the dispute shall be settled by a sole arbitrator,<br />

they may, by agreement, nominate the sole arbitrator for confirmation. If the parties<br />

fail to nominate a sole arbitrator . . . the sole arbitrator shall be appointed by the<br />

Court.<br />

Id. See also Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, supra note 132,<br />

§ 1404.11. The FMCS rules state that:<br />

If the parties do not agree on an arbitrator from the first panel, the OAS will furnish<br />

a second and third panel to the parties upon joint request and payment of an<br />

additional fee. Requests for a second or third panel should be accompanied by a<br />

brief explanation as to why the previous panel(s) was inadequate. If parties are<br />

unable to agree on a selection after having received three panels, the OAS will<br />

make a direct appointment upon joint request.<br />

Id.<br />

136. GABRIEL WILNER, DOMKE ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 24-1 (Larry<br />

Edmonson ed., Thomson West 2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!