19.07.2013 Views

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN ARBITRATION [<strong>Vol</strong>. 5:1<br />

The site of ad-hoc arbitration will most often be the arbitrator’s office,<br />

the office of one of the parties, or a rented conference room. 184<br />

Given the nature of the arbitration process, additional factors should<br />

be taken into consideration in determining the most convenient location<br />

for an arbitration, including neutrality, formality, and cost. Because the<br />

parties may choose any convenient place, neutrality of the situs of the<br />

arbitration can be at issue. Some advocates prefer that the hearing<br />

always be held in a neutral place. To other advocates, neutrality of place<br />

is not important, as long as the location is convenient to all parties. Cost<br />

is an important consideration, keeping in mind that the purpose of<br />

arbitration is to reduce the time and cost spent on resolving the<br />

dispute. 185 To reduce time and travel expenses, parties can choose a<br />

forum that is close to the parties. If the parties rent a conference room in<br />

a hotel, they will split the cost of the room unless the contract specifies<br />

something different. Formality can be an issue. The environment should<br />

be conducive to a dignified arbitration hearing; there is a danger if the<br />

place is too informal. For example, “arbitrations held in hotel rooms,<br />

offices, union halls, or other places associated with non-judicial business<br />

can increase the likelihood that the proceeding will degenerate from a<br />

true hearing into a free form meeting.” 186<br />

Generally, parties to a dispute are responsible for deciding on a<br />

location that is acceptable to both parties. As an alternative, parties may<br />

choose to have the arbitration administered by an agency, such as the<br />

AAA; in which case, a Case Manager will be assigned to the arbitration<br />

proceedings and will talk with the parties and reach a decision as to the<br />

location, time, and date of the arbitration hearing. 187 Factors the AAA<br />

184. Glen Spencer, Administered vs. Non-administered Arbitration, 54 DISP.<br />

RESOL. J. 42, 46 (Feb. 1999). In ad-hoc arbitration:<br />

[T]he arbitrator’s offices are most commonly used. Sometimes, hotel<br />

conference rooms are rented for the hearing when no other option exists.<br />

From time to time, parties complain that the arbitrator conducts too much<br />

other business during the hearing day, thus delaying the proceedings. The<br />

likelihood of this happening is highest if the arbitrator is hosting the<br />

hearing at his or her office.<br />

Id.<br />

185. Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Geography as a Litigation Weapon: Consumers,<br />

Forum-Selection Clauses, and the Rehnquist Court, 40 UCLA L. REV. 423, 445-49<br />

(1992).<br />

186. Hart & Wolf, supra note 107, at 1441.<br />

187. Michael D. Young, Endispute Rules and Procedures, in LITIGATION 1993,<br />

at 241, 245 (PLI Litig. & Admin. Practice, Course Handbook Series No. H4-5177,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!