19.07.2013 Views

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

2006/Vol. 5 No.1 - Hamline Law - Hamline University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN ARBITRATION [<strong>Vol</strong>. 5:1<br />

misconduct or other disregard of duty.” 321<br />

L. Is the Process of Arbitration to Achieve a Final Decision or to Seek<br />

Truth and Find Justice<br />

Justice Thurgood Marshall proposed that, “the governing principle<br />

of a humane society and a good legal system . . . [is to] recognize the<br />

worth and importance of every person . . . [and] be perceived by all the<br />

people as providing equal justice.” 322 Ultimately, what should an<br />

arbitrator do? Is an arbitrator only to interpret the four corners of the<br />

contract? Or, is the arbitrator’s role to find truth and justice? Is the<br />

process of arbitration simply a process to lead to a final decision; or is it<br />

a process to seek truth and find justice?<br />

X. CONCLUSION<br />

Thomas Jefferson wrote, “I know no safe depository of the ultimate<br />

powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them<br />

not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome<br />

discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their<br />

discretion.” 323 Arbitration puts power in the hands of the parties in the<br />

conflict. The parties are responsible for drafting the arbitration clauses,<br />

which determine the who, what, when, where, how, and why of settling<br />

disputes.<br />

Arbitration is intended to be an economical process. But<br />

“[i]nexpensive, expeditious and informal adjudication is not always<br />

synonymous with fair and just adjudication.” 324 Arbitration must be an<br />

equitable process equivalent to litigation. 325 In the end the AAA Code of<br />

321. Ehlert v. W. Nat’l Mut. Ins. Co., 207 N.W.2d 334, 336 (1973) (quoting<br />

Cournoyer v. Am. Television & Radio Co., 83 N.W.2d 409, 411 (1957)).<br />

322. Michael Z. Green, Preempting Justice Through Binding Arbitration of<br />

Future Disputes: Mere Adhesion Contracts or a Trap for the Unwary Consumer, 5<br />

LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 112 (1993) (citing Mr. Justice Marshall Lives on in His<br />

Words, NAT’L L.J., Feb. 8, 1993, at 8 (Statements by Justice Thurgood Marshall at<br />

the Eighth Conference on the <strong>Law</strong> of the World, (1977)).<br />

323. Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Charles Jarvis (Sept. 28, 1820),<br />

cited in Larry D. Kramer, The Supreme Court 2000 Term Foreword: We the Court,<br />

115 HARV. L. REV. 4, 86 (2001).<br />

324. Harry T. Edwards, Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?,<br />

99 HARV. L. REV. 668, 679 (1986).<br />

325. See AAA, Code of Ethics, supra note 101, at Canon I(A). Canon I(A) of the<br />

AAA Code of Ethics states:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!