19.07.2013 Views

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MURDERERS AND SERIOUS SEXUAL OFFENDERS – A BRIEF DESCRIPTION<br />

For this study, HI data on method of killing were combined into eight categories<br />

found to be useful in previous work (Soothill, Francis, Ackerley <strong>and</strong> Collett, 1999).<br />

An initial question was whether the type of method used differed between those<br />

with previous convictions <strong>and</strong> those without. For example, it might be reasonable to<br />

expect that those with previous convictions may be closer to the criminal fraternity<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore have access to firearms. Table 4 shows the sample of 569 murderers<br />

divided into those with <strong>and</strong> without previous convictions, <strong>and</strong> separated into eight<br />

categories according to the method used in the murder.<br />

Arguably, the surprises are the similarities rather than the differences. In both<br />

groups, around one in ten persons shot their victim <strong>and</strong> around one in seven killed<br />

by strangulation/asphyxiation/drowning. The largest category, where a sharp<br />

instrument was used, did not reveal a significant difference at the five per cent level.<br />

Only the ‘other’ method showed significantly different results for those with <strong>and</strong><br />

without previous convictions. This is, however, a small ‘catch-all’ category covering<br />

such diverse methods as exposure of a newly born child, causing to fall against a<br />

hard surface <strong>and</strong> striking with a motor vehicle.<br />

Table 4: Method used to murder <strong>and</strong> previous criminal history<br />

No previous Previous<br />

convictions convictions<br />

No. % No. %<br />

Sharp instrument 81 44.5 141 36.4<br />

Blunt instrument 23 12.6 58 15.0<br />

Hitting/kicking 24 13.2 71 18.3<br />

Strangulation/asphyxiation/drowning 29 15.9 54 14.0<br />

Arson 2 1.1 2 0.5<br />

Shooting 17 9.3 38 9.8<br />

Other (a) 2 1.1 18 4.7<br />

Unknown 4 2.2 5 1.3<br />

TOTAL 182 100.0 387 100.0<br />

Significant differences (at the 5% level) are shown in bold<br />

(a) In this study, ‘other’ method consists of the HI categories: exhaust fumes; other poisoning; exposure<br />

of newly-born child; negligence or neglect; aborting; explosion; causing to fall against a hard<br />

surface; burning, scalding; <strong>and</strong> struck by motor vehicle, as well as the HI category of ‘other’.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!