Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
The findings clearly provide an empirical way of examining offences which require<br />
Sex Offender Registration. One of the objectives behind the establishment of the<br />
Sex Offenders Register (under the Sex Offenders Act 1997), was to ‘help the police<br />
both prevent crimes…identify suspects once an offence has been perpetrated, <strong>and</strong><br />
might also act as a deterrent to re-offending’ (Plotnikoff <strong>and</strong> Woolfson, 2000). As<br />
others have highlighted, a number of serious offences do not necessitate registration<br />
even if a sexual component was present in the offence (e.g. murder, manslaughter,<br />
kidnapping <strong>and</strong> abduction). Within indecent assault against adult females, only more<br />
serious cases (convictions with a custodial sentence of over 30 months) require<br />
registration. This study tends to confirm some of the methodology that underpins the<br />
Sex Offenders Register, but also suggests that the type of offences (<strong>and</strong> sentences)<br />
which trigger registration could usefully be considered against these findings (given<br />
that some minor sexual offences appear to indicate an increased relative risk of<br />
convictions for subsequent SSA). To this end, the review of the Sex Offender Act<br />
(Home Office, 2001) recommended that indecent assault offences against adult<br />
females receiving more minor sentences should require registration.<br />
One area which clearly lends itself towards further analysis is the offence of<br />
kidnapping as a precursor offence for both serious sexual assault <strong>and</strong> murder. The<br />
tragic death of Sarah Payne has raised public concerns over predatory stranger<br />
paedophiles. This study suggests that more focused studies on small groups of very<br />
serious offenders (<strong>and</strong> relevant control groups), as a means to identify risk, might<br />
possibly yield dividends.<br />
The analysis of the future risk of homicide by victim-offender relationship, also<br />
suggests that our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the risk of future serious offending may be<br />
markedly improved by analysis built upon more detailed offence <strong>and</strong> offender data.<br />
The absence of detailed data on the nature of sex offenders <strong>and</strong> their offences has<br />
been an impediment in this sense, but several initiatives are under way which will<br />
improve data quality in this important area, <strong>and</strong> will allow further research to be<br />
much more focused 13 .<br />
From an investigative perspective, this study has provided a framework for National<br />
Crime <strong>and</strong> Operations Faculty to guide the collection of information on precursor<br />
offences which lie outside the current offence criteria of murder <strong>and</strong> rape. A limited<br />
range of ‘unusual’ offence categories which scored a high relative risk of subsequent<br />
serious offending would appear to offer most in terms of linking to more serious,<br />
subsequent offences.<br />
43<br />
13 For instance, the plan to establish<br />
a national <strong>Sexual</strong> <strong>and</strong> Violent<br />
Offenders Database <strong>and</strong> the move<br />
towards routine ‘flagging’ of all<br />
violence offences by the offendervictim<br />
relationship.