19.07.2013 Views

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MURDERERS AND SERIOUS SEXUAL OFFENDERS WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY<br />

Table 6: Relative risks for murder among general offenders with a previous<br />

criminal history (a)<br />

Cases Controls p-val Relative ‘B<strong>and</strong>’<br />

N=386 N=1,542 risk<br />

Increased risk of murder % %<br />

Custody for any previous conviction 60.9 52.2 .0017 1.45<br />

Criminal damage (combined) (b) 54.9 49.0 .0330 1.28<br />

Other wounding etc. 53.1 43.7 .0007 1.48 Frequent<br />

Custody at previous conviction (c) 32.1 19.7 .0000 1.93<br />

Robbery <strong>and</strong> assaults with intent 20.2 10.2 .0000 2.27<br />

Arson 7.5 3.6 .0014 2.22<br />

Theft from automated machines 7.3 3.7 .0043 2.05 Sizeable<br />

Wounding (endangering life) 6.5 2.7 .0008 2.48<br />

Absconding from lawful custody 3.4 1.6 .0295 2.23 Rare<br />

Kidnapping 1.6 0.4 .0207 4.00<br />

Manslaughter 1.3 0.1 .0008 19.39<br />

Blackmail 1.0 0.2 .0310 5.33 Unusual<br />

Soliciting by a man 0.5 0.0 .0115 (100)<br />

Adulteration of food or drugs 0.5 0.0 .0115 (100)<br />

Decreased risk of murder % %<br />

Other theft 49.5 56.3 .0151 0.76<br />

Shoplifting 35.2 40.9 .0380 0.78 Frequent<br />

Receiving 32.6 39.1 .0188 0.76<br />

Fraud 20.0 24.8 .0382 0.75<br />

Theft from vehicles 19.4 24.8 .0230 0.73 Sizeable<br />

Drugs offences (combined) (b) 18.1 27.8 .0000 0.56<br />

Attempting to pervert course of justice 0.3 2.0 .0053 0.13 Unusual<br />

Mean Mean<br />

Age at previous conviction (c) 24.7 25.4 .0032 0.96<br />

Length of previous criminal career 7.7 8.4 .0186 0.98<br />

No. of previous sentencing occasions<br />

No. of previous sentencing occasions<br />

7.3 8.1 .0375 0.98<br />

with no custodial sentence 5.3 6.2 .0008 0.96<br />

The figures in parentheses indicate where, due to there being either no cases or no controls present in our sample<br />

with that particular risk factor, the actual relative risk cannot be estimated. A p-value of .0000 indicates that<br />

the value is less than 0.00005<br />

(a) For a description of each column see earlier text. The results for those convictions for offences, etc., which<br />

were found not to be significant can be found on: www.cas.lancs.ac.uk/prcu/murderssa/supplement.pdf.<br />

(b) The combined ‘criminal damage’ <strong>and</strong> ‘drugs offences’ are each combinations of the various<br />

individual offence codes which have been used by the OI over time.<br />

(c) ‘Previous conviction’ (as distinct from ‘any previous conviction’) denotes convictions at the<br />

sentencing occasion immediately prior to that of the target offence.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!