19.07.2013 Views

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX B<br />

Appendix B: Developing the concept of absolute risk<br />

In this report, the concept of relative risk has been used, with little discussion of<br />

what the absolute risk of murder (or SSA) is for individuals with particular criminal<br />

histories. This is a deliberate strategy, as the absolute risk of murder is always<br />

conditional on the population under consideration, <strong>and</strong> the future time horizon. For<br />

example, estimating the absolute risk of those with a conviction for ‘other wounding<br />

etc.’ of subsequent murder until age 40 for those born in 1953 would be different to<br />

estimating the future lifetime absolute risk of the current criminal population. In<br />

addition, large samples are needed to calculate absolute risk with any degree of<br />

accuracy. However some progress can be made.<br />

This problem has been approached by looking at the OI birth cohorts. The 1953<br />

birth cohort contains the criminal histories of everyone born in one of four selected<br />

weeks in 1953 <strong>and</strong> convicted of a st<strong>and</strong>ard list offence; similar cohorts exist for<br />

1958, 1963, 1968, 1973 <strong>and</strong> 1978. This gives us a prospective data set, but one<br />

subtly different to the dataset used in the report. First, many of the offenders in the<br />

cohort samples are minor offenders (committing a single offence in their teens <strong>and</strong><br />

then desisting); this is somewhat different to the active criminals chosen for the<br />

case-control study. Secondly, the later cohorts are young cohorts – the 1978 cohort<br />

in particular is only followed up until 1999, the offenders in this cohort would be 22<br />

or younger. For this reason, two later cohorts have been excluded.<br />

Three sample offences have been considered here: other wounding etc., robbery <strong>and</strong><br />

kidnapping. Two methods of estimation of absolute risk were used: a direct method<br />

based on the cohort data alone; <strong>and</strong> an indirect method using the estimated relative<br />

risk from the case-control study.<br />

Other wounding etc. (offence code 8)<br />

The table below gives the number of murders <strong>and</strong> non-murders for those with <strong>and</strong><br />

without prior ‘other wounding’, <strong>and</strong> calculates the odds-ratio <strong>and</strong> the relative risk.<br />

By combining all four cohorts together, it is possible to get a global estimate of<br />

absolute risk over a medium term time horizon. Given a previous conviction, the<br />

odds of murder given a prior ‘other wounding’ is estimated at one chance of murder<br />

to 688 against, <strong>and</strong> the absolute risk of murder given prior ‘other wounding’ was<br />

therefore estimated at 1 in 689. Similarly, the absolute risk of murder given no prior<br />

‘other wounding’ was estimated at 1 in 1068. The estimate of the relative risk of<br />

murder for prior ‘other wounding’ was the ratio of these two absolute risks:<br />

1068/689, or 1.551. The relative risk estimated by the case-control method was<br />

1.483, which represents a satisfying agreement.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!