Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
Murder and Serious Sexual Assault - Lancaster EPrints - Lancaster ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX C<br />
career of offences appearing in the table above will raise (or lower) the risk of future<br />
SSA relative to this individual. A second example is given below:<br />
Example B. A 22-year-old active male offender with prior convictions, at<br />
separate sentencing occasions, for unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl<br />
under 16, shoplifting <strong>and</strong> stealing in a dwelling. This last offence resulted in a<br />
custodial sentence of three months.<br />
The relevant features are identified from the criminal history. An offence of<br />
unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 has a relative risk contribution of<br />
3.692; an offence of stealing in a dwelling contributes 1.881 to the relative risk;<br />
<strong>and</strong> a conviction for shoplifting contributes 0.764. There are three previous<br />
sentencing occasions (two more than the baseline one), <strong>and</strong> so a factor of 0.966 is<br />
counted twice. Finally, a custodial sentence on the last sentencing occasion<br />
contributes an additional factor of 1.454.<br />
Some of these factors are less than one, <strong>and</strong> some are greater than one. The<br />
convictions of unlawful sexual intercourse with an under 16-year-old <strong>and</strong><br />
stealing in a dwelling, together with the custodial sentence at the last<br />
conviction all increase the relative risk, but this is mitigated by the shoplifting<br />
charge <strong>and</strong> having more than one previous conviction. Multiplying all the<br />
factors together gives<br />
3.692 x 1.881 x 0.764 x 0.966 x 0.966 x 1.454<br />
or<br />
7.20<br />
Therefore this offender has a risk of becoming a SSA offender that is over seven<br />
times as great as the baseline criminal.<br />
Several points are worth making on the general area of developing risk scores. It<br />
was surprising that there were so many previous offences that were found to be<br />
statistically significant. The usual pattern of re-conviction studies, where the<br />
number of previous convictions seems to ‘swamp’ the subtleties of the effect of<br />
different kinds of offences, was not evident here. It suggests that very particular<br />
types of criminal career patterns involving ‘type’ (that is, the importance of<br />
particular kinds of offences) rather than the ‘quantity’ (that is, any type of<br />
criminal activity), characterise the greater likelihood of persons becoming<br />
murderers, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> committing SSA, on the other. While the<br />
61