21.07.2013 Views

SCEBs - University of Colorado Boulder

SCEBs - University of Colorado Boulder

SCEBs - University of Colorado Boulder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

indicate that no significant strength benefits are achieved by the continued addition <strong>of</strong><br />

sand to the mix. In fact, the average UCS for the 1:4 soil mixes was slightly less than the<br />

average UCS for the 1:3.5 soil mixes. The author suggests that based on the observed<br />

trend, a clay to sand soil mix ratio ranging from 1:3 to 1:4 is optimal for further<br />

investigation with large block testing.<br />

Special care was taken to prepare the specimens at the same water content to<br />

minimize the number <strong>of</strong> factors affecting the results. Soil samples taken from each mix,<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> production, indicated a water content range <strong>of</strong> 11-12%. All specimens<br />

were produced with the same applied pressure and cured for the same amount <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Figure 4.25: UMU Mini-Blocks; Varied Soil Mix Ratios<br />

Soil Mix<br />

Ratio<br />

UMU Soil #11 Mix Ratio Test Results<br />

Average Dry<br />

Density [pcf]<br />

Average UCS<br />

[psi]<br />

Average E<br />

[ksi]<br />

1:2.5 136.5 1,346.7 37.4<br />

1:3 136.2 1,741.7 42.7<br />

1:3.5 132.3 1,887.0 43.0<br />

1:4 132.3 1,870.9 42.2<br />

Table 4.15<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!