Rudolph MG

Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006.24:419-466. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
by CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY on 04/04/10. For personal use only.
37. Rudolph MG, Luz JG, Wilson IA. 2002. Structural and thermodynamic correlates of
T-cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31:121–49
38. Allison TJ, Garboczi DN. 2002. Structure of γδ T cell receptors and their recognition
of non-peptide antigens. Mol. Immunol. 38:1051–61
39. Falk K, Rotzschke O, Stevanovic S, Jung G, Rammensee HG. 1991. Allele-specific motifs
revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature 351:290–96
40. Rudensky AY, Mazel SM, Yurin VL. 1990. Presentation of endogenous immunoglobulin
determinant to immunoglobulin-recognizing T cell clones by the thymic cells. Eur. J.
Immunol. 20:2235–39
41. van Bleek GM, Nathenson SG. 1991. The structure of the antigen-binding groove of
major histocompatibility complex class I molecules determines specific selection of selfpeptides.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:11032–36
42. Fremont DH, Matsumura M, Stura EA, Peterson PA, Wilson IA. 1992. Crystal structures
of two viral peptides in complex with murine MHC class I H-2K b . Science 257:919–27
43. Madden DR, Garboczi DN, Wiley DC. 1993. The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC
complexes: a comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by HLA-
A2. Cell 75:693–708
44. Stern LJ, Wiley DC. 1994. Antigenic peptide binding by class I and class II histocompatibility
proteins. Structure 2:245–51
45. Speir JA, Stevens J, Joly E, Butcher GW, Wilson IA. 2001. Two different, highly exposed,
bulged structures for an unusually long peptide bound to rat MHC class I RT1-A a .
Immunity 14:81–92
46. Zeng Z, Castaño AR, Segelke BW, Stura EA, Peterson PA, Wilson IA. 1997. Crystal
structure of mouse CD1: An MHC-like fold with a large hydrophobic binding groove.
Science 277:339–45
47. Zajonc DM, Elsliger MA, Teyton L, Wilson IA. 2003. Crystal structure of CD1a in
complex with a sulfatide self antigen at a resolution of 2.15 ˚A. Nat. Immun. 4:808–15
48. Zajonc DM, Crispin MD, Bowden TA, Young DC, Cheng TY, et al. 2005. Molecular
mechanism of lipopeptide presentation by CD1a. Immunity 22:209–19
49. Koch M, Stronge VS, Shepherd D, Gadola SD, Mathew B, et al. 2005. The crystal
structure of human CD1d with and without α-galactosylceramide. Nat. Immun. 6:819–
26
50. Batuwangala T, Shepherd D, Gadola SD, Gibson KJ, Zaccai NR, et al. 2004. The crystal
structure of human CD1b with a bound bacterial glycolipid. J. Immunol. 172:2382–88
51. Gadola SD, Zaccai NR, Harlos K, Shepherd D, Castro-Palomino JC, et al. 2002. Structure
of human CD1b with bound ligands at 2.3 ˚A, a maze for alkyl chains. Nat. Immun.
3:721–26
52. De Libero G, Mori L. 2005. Recognition of lipid antigens by T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol.
5:485–96
53. Van Rhijn I, Zajonc DM, Wilson IA, Moody DB. 2005. T-cell activation by lipopeptide
antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17:222–29
54. Sullivan BA, Nagarajan NA, Kronenberg M. 2005. CD1 and MHC II find different means
to the same end. Trends Immunol. 26:282–88
55. Moody DB, Zajonc DM, Wilson IA. 2005. Anatomy of CD1-lipid antigen complexes.
Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:387–99
56. Rudolph MG, Wingren C, Crowley MP, Chien YH, Wilson IA. 2004. Combined pseudomerohedral
twinning, non-crystallographic symmetry and pseudo-translation in a monoclinic
crystal form of the γδ T-cell ligand T10. Acta Cryst. D60:656–64
460 Rudolph· Stanfield· Wilson