25.07.2013 Views

Download Complete Issue in PDF - Educational Technology & Society

Download Complete Issue in PDF - Educational Technology & Society

Download Complete Issue in PDF - Educational Technology & Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

variable will take the value 1 to update each particle’s current position. In short, the bit of a particle will be restricted<br />

to zero or one, where each Vid represents the probability of bit Xid tak<strong>in</strong>g the value 1.<br />

Wiki technology<br />

The concept of wiki was first proposed by Ward Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham <strong>in</strong> 1995, who used the word to name an environment<br />

he developed for co-workers to share specifications and documents for software design.<br />

The specific functionality of a wiki is called open edit<strong>in</strong>g, and the <strong>in</strong>herent characteristics of this mean that such<br />

systems can be excellent tools to support group processes and to create knowledge repositories <strong>in</strong> an onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

environment (Leuf & Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, 2001). Moreover, some <strong>in</strong>vestigators have suggested that wiki systems can be<br />

useful tools for build<strong>in</strong>g communities of practice (Lo, 2009; Shih, Tseng, & Yang, 2008). In recent years, many wiki<br />

sites have been built on the Internet, with the most famous be<strong>in</strong>g Wikipedia, an onl<strong>in</strong>e open-source encyclopedia<br />

(Wikipedia, 2004). In the educational doma<strong>in</strong>, many studies have been <strong>in</strong>spired by Wikipedia to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the<br />

effectiveness of such systems with regard to teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g, as well as to develop practical approaches for<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e collaboration (Ebersbach, Glaser, & Heigl, 2006; Wheeler, Yeomans, & Wheeler, 2008).<br />

Problem description<br />

In this study, we propose an enhanced particle swarm optimization (EPSO) method to model a teach<strong>in</strong>g material<br />

generation problem under different assessment criteria, and the EPSO aims at m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the differences between<br />

execution results and <strong>in</strong>structors’ actual requirements. Three <strong>in</strong>dicators are usually considered <strong>in</strong> the literature with<br />

regard to <strong>in</strong>structors develop<strong>in</strong>g teach<strong>in</strong>g materials (Hofmann, 2004; Shih, Tseng, & Yang, 2008), and thus this study<br />

adopts these as the assessment criteria, namely: the difficulty of the material, the expected lecture time, and the<br />

relevant topics.<br />

In this study, a learn<strong>in</strong>g object, <strong>in</strong> compliance with the IEEE LOM standard, is a digital entity conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a lecture<br />

about a particular topic. With regard to the difficulty and lecture time, IEEE LOM has def<strong>in</strong>ed two elements, namely<br />

difficulty and typical learn<strong>in</strong>g time, to describe these (IEEE, 2002). A five-rat<strong>in</strong>g scheme is used to describe the<br />

difficulty of learn<strong>in</strong>g objects from very easy to very difficult, while the typical time required to learn an object is<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g an open text field that developers can enter their own responses <strong>in</strong>. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these two elements,<br />

educators can obta<strong>in</strong> both the desired difficulty and lecture time of the learn<strong>in</strong>g objects, and thus better plan their<br />

courses. Generally, the difficulty and time required to learn a learn<strong>in</strong>g object can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by doma<strong>in</strong> experts,<br />

but this is a time-consum<strong>in</strong>g task. To cope with this problem, several studies have proposed automatic metadata<br />

generation approaches (Meire, Ochoa, & Duval, 2007; Motolet, & Baloian, 2007). Furthermore, with regard to topic<br />

relevance, several researchers have proposed various approaches that can help teachers to relate learn<strong>in</strong>g objects and<br />

topics (Hwang, 2003; Jong, L<strong>in</strong>, Wu, & Chan, 2004), and educators can obta<strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> different ways,<br />

based on their specific requirements. Therefore, this study assumes that such <strong>in</strong>formation is already available when it<br />

works on the teach<strong>in</strong>g material generation problem.<br />

More specifically, assume there is a learn<strong>in</strong>g object repository (LOR) consist<strong>in</strong>g of n learn<strong>in</strong>g objects, O1, O2,…,<br />

Oi,…, On. An <strong>in</strong>structor requires a teach<strong>in</strong>g material which aims at k topics, T1, T2,…, Tx,…, Tk, and the lecture time is<br />

expected to range from l seconds to u seconds. Moreover, suppose the <strong>in</strong>structor requires the teach<strong>in</strong>g material with a<br />

specific difficulty degree, D. Therefore, to organize the teach<strong>in</strong>g material, c learn<strong>in</strong>g objects will be selected from the<br />

LOR. Furthermore, each learn<strong>in</strong>g object selected cannot be repeated <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al comb<strong>in</strong>ational result and is relevant<br />

to one or more of the specified topics. Naturally, the c learn<strong>in</strong>g objects are a subset of the n learn<strong>in</strong>g objects, c ∈ n .<br />

The variables used <strong>in</strong> this model are given as follows:<br />

n, the number of learn<strong>in</strong>g objects <strong>in</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g object repository<br />

k, the number of topics to be provided by the teach<strong>in</strong>g material<br />

c, the number of learn<strong>in</strong>g objects to be selected to organize a draft of the teach<strong>in</strong>g material<br />

Oi, 1 ≤ i ≤ n , the i th learn<strong>in</strong>g object <strong>in</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g object repository which consists of n learn<strong>in</strong>g objects<br />

Tx, 1 ≤ x ≤ k , the x th topic to be provided by the teach<strong>in</strong>g material which aims at k topics<br />

si, ≤ i ≤ n<br />

1 , si is 1 if the Oi is organized <strong>in</strong> the draft of the teach<strong>in</strong>g material, 0, otherwise<br />

D, 0 < D ≤ 1,<br />

the target degree of difficulty for the draft generated<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!