25.07.2013 Views

Download - Educational Technology & Society

Download - Educational Technology & Society

Download - Educational Technology & Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The students’ most common response regarding the differences between their procedures and those of Miriam and<br />

Yossi concerned the resources (books and Internet) used, as indicated in table 4. The table shows that students<br />

approve of both resources; yet the public-school classes tend to prefer the Internet, as reflected in the fact that about<br />

half of Serge’s and Yaakov’s students (48% and 54%, respectively) objected to Miriam’s decision to use books<br />

primarily and only about a quarter (24% and 27%, respectively) objected to Yossi’s decision to rely exclusively on<br />

the Internet. In contrast, Gidi’s class had a more balanced attitude towards the use of books and the Internet, as<br />

reflected in the fact that nearly half of the class asserted that unlike Yossi they would use books and 37% objected to<br />

Miriam’s choice of resources.<br />

Part C<br />

Table 5 presents students’ responses to statements regarding the relationship between computers/Internet and<br />

learning as well as the intellectual gains from school and history classes on a scale of 1 to 4, where 1 and 4 represent<br />

strong disagreement and strong agreement, respectively. For each statement, the mean (M) and the standard<br />

deviation (sd) of each class is shown. An asterisk (*) was added near the mean to indicate significance according to a<br />

t-test (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!