30.07.2013 Views

The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006

The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006

The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Politics of Construction continued<br />

Project labor agreements could lock<br />

<strong>Alaska</strong>ns out of gasline jobs<br />

For 30 years oil revenues have enriched the lives of all<br />

<strong>Alaska</strong>ns. Today we are closer than ever to a new era of<br />

fi nancial stability by commercializing our vast reserves of<br />

natural gas.<br />

Gov. Frank Murkowski’s administration negotiated a contract<br />

with the three Prudhoe Bay leaseholders to build a pipeline<br />

along the <strong>Alaska</strong> Highway delivering the gas to the Midwest<br />

where there’s enough demand to make the pipeline profi table<br />

under several gas price scenarios.<br />

Since Gov. Murkowski lost the primary election it is unclear<br />

if the gasline project will be left to the next governor. I personally<br />

believe there is plenty of time for the Legislature and the<br />

administration to complete a gasline contract. (As I write this,<br />

the Murkowski administration and producers are working on<br />

changes to the contract and will determine if a third special session<br />

will take place.)<br />

Election year politics made the gasline contract a political<br />

piñata. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Gasline Port Authority and several political<br />

candidates took cheap shots at the contract and everyone who<br />

BY SEN. JOHN COWDERY<br />

disagreed with them. I want to clear up some of the misinformation<br />

that’s out there so if another administration restarts the<br />

negotiations we can all have a better understanding of the issue.<br />

A recent opinion column by gubernatorial candidate Tony<br />

Knowles in the Anchorage Daily News called for a project labor<br />

agreement with construction unions to be part of the contract.<br />

This is the same candidate who was governor for eight years<br />

and couldn’t even get the producers to sit down at the bargaining<br />

table to talk about a gas pipeline.<br />

Knowles claims a project labor agreement puts <strong>Alaska</strong>ns at<br />

the front of the line for pipeline construction jobs. That statement<br />

just fl oors me. Project labor agreements can actually lock<br />

thousands of <strong>Alaska</strong>ns out of pipeline construction jobs.<br />

First, let me say that I used to be a union member myself. I<br />

held a union card with the Carpenters Local 1281 and Operating<br />

Engineers Local 302.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Department of Labor says our state has about<br />

20,000 construction workers. Only 6,000 of them are unionized.<br />

A project labor agreement means only unionized<br />

construction workers get pipeline construction<br />

jobs. <strong>The</strong>re simply aren’t enough of<br />

them to build the pipeline and other projects<br />

around the state at the same time.<br />

A project labor agreement will lockout<br />

thousands of rural residents from pipeline jobs<br />

because virtually none of them are unionized.<br />

<strong>The</strong> gas pipeline is the golden opportunity for<br />

villagers to provide for their families and we<br />

need to make sure they get that opportunity.<br />

So who will get those remaining construction<br />

jobs? Not <strong>Alaska</strong>ns. Thousands of union<br />

members from the Lower-48 will be brought<br />

up to work on the pipeline while their paychecks<br />

go back to Oklahoma and Texas.<br />

<strong>The</strong> unions like to point to their state funded<br />

vocational and union training programs. I<br />

have always supported these programs as a<br />

legislator and will continue to do so because<br />

they create good paying jobs for young people<br />

that choose not to pursue a college degree.<br />

What the unions neglect to point out is<br />

that these programs only graduate a handful<br />

of students each year. In 2004 only 31 students<br />

completed training to become truck drivers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> welding programs trained 34 students<br />

that same year. Anyone can see there simply<br />

aren’t enough graduates to fi ll the thousands<br />

of jobs a gasline project will create.<br />

20 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> CONTRACTOR <strong>Fall</strong> <strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!