The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006
The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006
The Alaska Contractor: Fall 2006
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Knowles<br />
continued from page 63<br />
to consider <strong>Alaska</strong>n contractors’ capabilities<br />
when they are scoping and<br />
packaging projects and contracts to<br />
insure maximum utilization of <strong>Alaska</strong>n<br />
contractors. <strong>The</strong> state gets the<br />
most professional project development<br />
and we keep the jobs and investment<br />
in state.<br />
It is essential that <strong>Alaska</strong> contractors<br />
are considered and allowed to<br />
compete for contracts to develop our<br />
natural resources. Previously, many<br />
<strong>Alaska</strong> contractors expanded their<br />
operations into oil and gas projects<br />
and mining development, and we<br />
need to emphasize through jaw-boning<br />
and contract terms, that <strong>Alaska</strong><br />
workers and contractors should be<br />
sought out and given a fair opportunity<br />
to participate in the development<br />
of our resources.<br />
I worked closely with the AGC,<br />
organized labor, and <strong>Alaska</strong> Native<br />
representatives to increase opportunities<br />
for contractors on rural<br />
projects. A.O. 199 provided for the<br />
re-introduction of competitive bidding<br />
as a viable option on Village<br />
Safe Water and other projects which<br />
had become almost administered under<br />
the “force account” system. <strong>The</strong><br />
current administration has not effectively<br />
implemented the provisions of<br />
A.O. 199 so painstakingly developed<br />
by the Rural Construction Working<br />
Group - I will do so.<br />
<strong>Fall</strong> <strong>2006</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> CONTRACTOR 65