Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength

752
M.L. Bouxsein, E. Seeman / Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 23 (2009) 741–753
[82] Boutroy S, Van Rietbergen B, Sornay-Rendu E, et al. Finite element analysis based on in vivo HR-pQCT images of the
distal radius is associated with wrist fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2008;23(3):392–9.
[83] Seeman E, Delmas PD, Hanley DA, et al. Effects of denosumab and alendronate on skeletal microarchitecture International
Bone and Mineral Society Meeting, Sydney. 2009.
[84] Rizzoli R, Felsenberg D, Laroche M, et al. Strontium ranelate has a more positive influence than alendronate on distal
tibia cortical and trabecluar bone microstructure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2009;
20:165–6.
[85] Boivin G, Meunier PJ. Changes in bone remodeling rate influence the degree of mineralization of bone. Connect Tissue
Res 2002;43(2–3):535–7.
[86] Boivin G, Deloffre P, Perrat B, et al. Strontium distribution and interactions with bone mineral in monkey iliac bone
after strontium salt (S 12911) administration. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11(9):1302–11.
[87] Wehrli FW, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC. Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR
Biomed 2006;19(7):731–64.
*[88] Wehrli FW. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance
imaging.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(2):390–409.
[89] Link TM, Majumdar S, Grampp S, et al. Imaging of trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol 1999;9(9):1781–8.
[90] Wehrli FW, Saha PK, Gomberg BR, et al. Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular
bone. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002;13(5):335–55.
[91] Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius:
relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 1996;6(5):376–85.
[92] Link TM, Vieth V, Stehling C, et al. High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular
bone structure best? Eur Radiol 2003;13(4):663–71.
[93] Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET, et al. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images
of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 2005;16(11):1307–14.
[94] Banerjee S, Han ET, Krug R, et al. Application of refocused steady-state free-precession methods at 1.5 and 3 T to in
vivo high-resolution MRI of trabecular bone: simulations and experiments. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21(6):818–25.
[95] Blumenfeld J, Studholme C, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. Three-dimensional image registration of MR proximal femur
images for the analysis of trabecular bone parameters. Med Phys 2008;35(10):4630–9.
[96] Benito M, Gomberg B, Wehrli FW, et al. Deterioration of trabecular architecture in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2003;88(4):1497–502.
[97] Wehrli FW, Leonard MB, Saha PK, Gomberg BR. Quantitative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging reveals
structural implications of renal osteodystrophy on trabecular and cortical bone. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20(1):
83–9.
*[98] Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, et al. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and
osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone
Miner Res 1997;12(1):111–8.
[99] Wehrli FW, Hwang SN, Ma J, et al. Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with
MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology 1998;206(2):347–57.
[100] Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, et al. In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in
osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13(7):1175–82.
[101] Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P, et al. Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance
imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Magnetic Resonance Science Center and Osteoporosis and
Arthritis Research Group. Osteoporos Int 1999;10(3):231–9.
*[102] Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, et al. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of
trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16(8):1520–31.
[103] Link TM, Bauer JS. Imaging of trabecular bone structure. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6(3):253–61.
[104] Benito M, Vasilic B, Wehrli FW, et al. Effect of testosterone replacement on trabecular architecture in hypogonadal
men.
J Bone Miner Res 2005;20(10):1785–91.
[105] Chesnut 3rd CH, Majumdar S, Newitt DC, et al. Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as
determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20(9):
1548–61.
[106] Wu Y, Chesler DA, Glimcher MJ, et al. Multinuclear solid-state three-dimensional MRI of bone and synthetic calcium
phosphates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96(4):1574–8.
[107] Wu Y, Ackerman JL, Chesler DA, et al. Density of organic matrix of native mineralized bone measured by water- and
fat-suppressed proton projection MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(1):59–68.
[108] Anumula S, Magland J, Wehrli SL, et al. Measurement of phosphorus content in normal and osteomalacic rabbit bone
by solid-state 3D radial imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;56(5):946–52.
[109] Wu Y, Dai G, Ackerman JL, et al. Water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of rat femur bone. Magn
Reson Med 2007;57(3):554–67.
[110] Cao H, Ackerman JL, Hrovat MI, et al. Quantitative bone matrix density measurement by water- and fat-suppressed
proton projection MRI (WASPI) with polymer calibration phantoms. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(6):1433–43.
[111] Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder GM, Neubauer S. Human imaging of phosphorus in cortical and trabecular bone in
vivo. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(5):888–92.
[112] Stokstad E. Bone quality fills holes in fracture risk. Science 2005;308(5728):1580.
[113] Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, et al. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.
J Biomech 1999;32(10):1013–20.
[114] Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better
than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2003;33(4):744–50.