02.08.2013 Views

A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber

A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber

A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 9.3 Cumulative average cost £/tonne<br />

Cumulative average cost £/tonne CO2 stored<br />

Discount Year 2040 2050 2050 only <strong>for</strong> 2030 sources<br />

Low 3.34 1.98 2.85<br />

6.5% Central 3.28 2.21 2.27<br />

High 2.76 1.92 2.02<br />

Low 1.57 0.88 1.30<br />

11% Central 1.71 1.06 1.12<br />

High 1.57 1.01 1.09<br />

Low 1.02 0.53 0.84<br />

14% Central 1.18 0.71 0.76<br />

High 1.16 0.73 0.79<br />

The conclusion is that <strong>for</strong> the central case<br />

by 2040 846 million tonnes would be<br />

transported <strong>for</strong> an average cost of £1.71/<br />

tonne. Due to timing of investments and<br />

design differences the other cases in this<br />

instance have a lower cost per tonne, but<br />

the table shows that different discount rates<br />

have more influence on costs per tonne than<br />

do the differences between scenarios.<br />

If not otherwise noted the costs per tonne<br />

refer to the 2040 volumes and cumulative<br />

costs at 11% discount using £1.70/tonne.<br />

Analysis of the most favourable standalone<br />

case of a near coastal source using just<br />

Ravenspurn North <strong>for</strong> storage from the<br />

same date as the central scenario shows<br />

the following comparison:<br />

Table 9.4 Cumulative average cost £/tonne best stand-alone comparison<br />

Cumulative average cost £/tonne CO2 stored<br />

Year 2040 2050<br />

Ideal standalone 1.83 1.33<br />

Central 1.71 1.06<br />

An inland site has additional pipeline costs<br />

and future business case analysis may show<br />

revenue requirement differences which make<br />

the standalone case less attractive, but the<br />

first emitter to commit to CO2 capture and<br />

storage does face higher costs whether<br />

or not their pipeline becomes part of an<br />

evolving <strong>network</strong>. There is there<strong>for</strong>e a need<br />

to address the problem of <strong>network</strong> initiation.<br />

Carbon Capture and Storage Network 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!