A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber
A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber
A cArbon cApture And storAge network for yorkshire And humber
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 9.3 Cumulative average cost £/tonne<br />
Cumulative average cost £/tonne CO2 stored<br />
Discount Year 2040 2050 2050 only <strong>for</strong> 2030 sources<br />
Low 3.34 1.98 2.85<br />
6.5% Central 3.28 2.21 2.27<br />
High 2.76 1.92 2.02<br />
Low 1.57 0.88 1.30<br />
11% Central 1.71 1.06 1.12<br />
High 1.57 1.01 1.09<br />
Low 1.02 0.53 0.84<br />
14% Central 1.18 0.71 0.76<br />
High 1.16 0.73 0.79<br />
The conclusion is that <strong>for</strong> the central case<br />
by 2040 846 million tonnes would be<br />
transported <strong>for</strong> an average cost of £1.71/<br />
tonne. Due to timing of investments and<br />
design differences the other cases in this<br />
instance have a lower cost per tonne, but<br />
the table shows that different discount rates<br />
have more influence on costs per tonne than<br />
do the differences between scenarios.<br />
If not otherwise noted the costs per tonne<br />
refer to the 2040 volumes and cumulative<br />
costs at 11% discount using £1.70/tonne.<br />
Analysis of the most favourable standalone<br />
case of a near coastal source using just<br />
Ravenspurn North <strong>for</strong> storage from the<br />
same date as the central scenario shows<br />
the following comparison:<br />
Table 9.4 Cumulative average cost £/tonne best stand-alone comparison<br />
Cumulative average cost £/tonne CO2 stored<br />
Year 2040 2050<br />
Ideal standalone 1.83 1.33<br />
Central 1.71 1.06<br />
An inland site has additional pipeline costs<br />
and future business case analysis may show<br />
revenue requirement differences which make<br />
the standalone case less attractive, but the<br />
first emitter to commit to CO2 capture and<br />
storage does face higher costs whether<br />
or not their pipeline becomes part of an<br />
evolving <strong>network</strong>. There is there<strong>for</strong>e a need<br />
to address the problem of <strong>network</strong> initiation.<br />
Carbon Capture and Storage Network 39