05.08.2013 Views

ABSTRACTS - oia - Portland State University

ABSTRACTS - oia - Portland State University

ABSTRACTS - oia - Portland State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASPAC Conference 2010<br />

June 18 – 20, 2010 | <strong>Portland</strong>, OR<br />

First it describes colonizer Japanese male and female’s self-fashioning as a middle class people in<br />

1930’s colonial Taiwan. Secondly, it describes communication with the dead, in other words bun-yuu (partage)<br />

of violent memories and death using the techniques of magical realism. The dead in this novel include both<br />

Japanese and indigenous Taiwanese people, the Sedrq in the “Musya” incident of 1930 and the Japanese<br />

female heroine Micha’s child as well as her niece, Lili’s child, and also Tsushima’s lost child.<br />

Third, this report considers how Tsushima’s perception of colonial Taiwan and the effect of the bunyuu<br />

of memory can be related to recent historical fruit. Nakamura Masau’s Captivity: Historical Anthropology on<br />

Subjective Nature and Social Power in Colonial Taiwan (2009, Ha-besuto) describes the colonial expansion of<br />

Japanese capital and the Emperor system of the modern state in relation to Japan and the indigenous<br />

Taiwanese peoples. The recent works of Tsushima (born in 1947) and Nakamura (born in 1944) who are of<br />

the same generation, overlap at the point of reflexive description of modern Japan’s behavior in relation to<br />

colonial Taiwan, especially its indigenous peoples. This report will investigate both memory and historical<br />

recognition from the point of how to take responsibility for colonial rule.<br />

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />

Pramila Neupane<br />

Globalization and Education in Asia: A Comparison between Success and Failure<br />

Link between education and globalization is one of the major subjects of interest in the contemporary<br />

discourse on international development. Increasing global interaction and interdependence has expanded<br />

opportunities for those countries in Asia with better levels of education but has made progress more difficult<br />

for countries with low levels of education. Thus, what are the relationships between globalization and<br />

education in the region and to how important is investment in human resources for gaining more benefits<br />

from the increasing trend of globalization and ultimately for the development of a country? To answer these<br />

questions, this paper compares the education, globalization, income and health indicators of successful and<br />

unsuccessful countries in terms of per capita income growth over the period of 1970 to 2006. The study finds<br />

that countries with high levels of education, savings and good socioeconomic policies have attracted foreign<br />

direct investment and advanced technology, and have achieved rapid export growth and other aspects of<br />

globalization. For example, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, and China represent such success stories. On the<br />

other hand, countries with low levels of education, such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan and Papua New<br />

Guinea have found it more difficult to achieve progress. They have experienced very slow growth in per<br />

capita income and have not been able to effectively integrate with the global economy and society. Rather,<br />

globalization has made it more difficult to secure investment in education in these countries, because<br />

government expenditures in the social sector have been severely reduced to adjust to the negative<br />

consequences of globalization. Consequently, the development gap has been widening in the region.<br />

Successful countries have a good spread of education that leads to high growth and more resources for<br />

further educational development, whereas failing countries have poor human resources that lead to very low<br />

growth and limit their capacity to build up their educational systems. Thus, how to secure the necessary<br />

investment in the education sector in such countries is the urgent issue for further research.<br />

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />

Jeffrey Newmark<br />

Confucian Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan and Korea: Amenomori Hōshū (1668–1755)<br />

In the narrative of Tokugawa era Confucianism, Amenomori Hōshū represents an aberration of sorts. Even<br />

after Ogyū Sorai’s (1666-1728) spearheaded the turn toward kogaku (ancient studies), Amenomori levied<br />

criticism on his contemporary by criticizing Sorai’s emphasis on philology over virtue. In contrast,<br />

Amenomori’s philosophy relied on the Song Confucian interpretation of the Confucian Classics and offered a<br />

series of didactic platitudes that at times inverted or simply restated the teachings of Han Yu (768-824) and<br />

Chu Hsi (1130-1200). Yet, Amenomori’s principal contribution to Edo Confucianism was not in the realm of<br />

thought, but rather in the diplomatic world. Amenomori Hōshū served as a quasi-diplomat for the Tokguawa<br />

Shogunate in the mid eighteenth century. While his predecessor in intellectual diplomacy, Arai Hakuseki<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!