09.08.2013 Views

Guidelines for Impact Monitoring & Assessment in Microfinance ...

Guidelines for Impact Monitoring & Assessment in Microfinance ...

Guidelines for Impact Monitoring & Assessment in Microfinance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MONITORING & ASSESSMENT IN MICROFINANCE PROGRAMMES<br />

FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWS<br />

A focus group <strong>in</strong>terview is an <strong>in</strong>expensive rapid appraisal technique that provides<br />

quick qualitative <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation to aid <strong>in</strong> the process of <strong>for</strong>mulat<strong>in</strong>g impact hypotheses<br />

and identify<strong>in</strong>g and select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicator sets. A facilitator guides 5 to 12 people <strong>in</strong> a<br />

discussion about their experiences, feel<strong>in</strong>gs, and preferences about hav<strong>in</strong>g access<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>ancial and social <strong>in</strong>termediation services. Sessions typically last one to two<br />

hours.<br />

Steps:<br />

1. Select the team: should be small, with at least one facilitator who speaks<br />

the local language<br />

2. Select the participants: consult key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants to select strategic <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

3. Decide on tim<strong>in</strong>g and location<br />

4. Prepare the discussion guide: outl<strong>in</strong>e issues and topics to be discussed<br />

5. Conduct <strong>in</strong>terview: establish rapport, phrase questions carefully, use prob<strong>in</strong>g<br />

techniques (repetition of question, adoption of ”sophisticated naïveté”<br />

posture, pause <strong>for</strong> answers, repeat replies, ask when, what, where, which,<br />

and how questions, use neutral comments, control the discussion, m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

group pressure)<br />

6. Record the discussion<br />

7. Analyse results: read summaries together, read transcripts, analyse each<br />

question separately (words, framework, <strong>in</strong>ternal agreement, precision responses,<br />

the big picture, report purpose)<br />

KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS<br />

Key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mant <strong>in</strong>terviews are qualitative, <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews of <strong>in</strong>dividuals selected<br />

<strong>for</strong> their first-hand knowledge about a topic of <strong>in</strong>terest. The number of key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants<br />

depends on the number of topics to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated. If possible, it is advisable<br />

to select several key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants on the same topic <strong>in</strong> order to avoid a subjective<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation base. The <strong>in</strong>terviews are loosely structured, rely<strong>in</strong>g on a list of issues<br />

to be discussed. Key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mant <strong>in</strong>terviews resemble a conversation among<br />

acqua<strong>in</strong>tances, allow<strong>in</strong>g a free flow of ideas and <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation. Interviewers frame<br />

questions spontaneously, probe <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation and take notes.<br />

Steps:<br />

1. Formulate study questions<br />

2. Prepare a short <strong>in</strong>terview guide<br />

3. Select key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants<br />

4. Conduct <strong>in</strong>terviews: establish rapport, sequence questions, phrase questions<br />

carefully, use prob<strong>in</strong>g techniques, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a neutral attitude, m<strong>in</strong>imize translation<br />

difficulties<br />

5. Take adequate notes<br />

6. Analyse <strong>in</strong>terview data: <strong>in</strong>terview summary sheets, descriptive codes, storage<br />

and retrieval, presentation of data<br />

7. Check <strong>for</strong> reliability and validity: representative key <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants, reliable key<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mants, possible bias of <strong>in</strong>terviewer or <strong>in</strong>vestigator, negative evidence, <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mant<br />

feedback<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!