10.08.2013 Views

"INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA AT ... - University of Utah

"INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA AT ... - University of Utah

"INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA AT ... - University of Utah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHU<br />

pore solution. This value is thought to reflect the contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

clays to the IP effect. Qv can be determined independently from the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> cation exchange capacity <strong>of</strong> the core sample (meq) to the pore<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> the sample (ml). The cation exchange capacity, CEC, in meq<br />

per 100gm <strong>of</strong> the rock sample, was measured by atomic absorption<br />

spectrometry. A summary <strong>of</strong> the measurements is given in Table 1.<br />

Both Qv and porosity depend upon the volume <strong>of</strong> interconnected pore<br />

passages within the rock. For non-expanding core samples, the pore<br />

volume was taken to be the volume <strong>of</strong> water absorbed by the rock after<br />

the two to three month soaking period. For samples which expanded [(c)<br />

and (f) <strong>of</strong> Table 1J, the pore volume was assumed to be the difference<br />

between the volume <strong>of</strong> water absorbed and the change in volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />

core sample. This latter procedure may have resulted in inflated QV<br />

values; but if the former procedure had been followed, the QV values for<br />

the expanded samples (c) and (f) would have been 1.34 equiv/l and 2.22<br />

equiv/l respectively, which are still larger than the Qv values for the<br />

non-expanded samples.<br />

The porosity (effective porosity) was determined from the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

the pore volume <strong>of</strong> the sample to the volume <strong>of</strong> the rock when wet.<br />

Data Interpretation<br />

Ten samples were prepared. Two <strong>of</strong> the samples were slightly<br />

hydrothermally altered, while another two were inadequately<br />

encapsulated. The remaining six samples were highly altered, and the<br />

data for these are shown in Table 1 and Figures 2a-2f.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> temperature. - The resistivity <strong>of</strong> the altered rocks is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!