"INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA AT ... - University of Utah

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$GU)\^^y-^' - University of Utah$

$e?Lx:>cP\^l - University of Utah$

esponse of this hot-water dominated system is generally small, in the range of 7 to 15 mr. The field and laboratory data also indicate that IP responses of from 20 to 34 mr are possible, though infrequent. There is no large scale delineation of the geothermal field. However, it is important to note that the zone of maximum alteration was not sampled by the two IP traverses documented here. CHU
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHU This research was funded by the Department of Energy, Division of Geothermal Energy, Contract DE-AC03-79ET27002. Thanks are due to Dr. W. T. Parry, for his aid in assessing the CEC values by atomic absorption spectrometry.
Page 1 and 2: GL04031 "INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA
Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION CHU The purpose of thi
Page 5: FIG. 2' Location map of Roosevelt H
Page 8: Data Acquisition LABORATORY RESEARC
Page 11 and 12: TABLE 1. Parameter values of effect
Page 13: FIGS. 2a-2f. Laboratory data arrang
Page 16 and 17: and (e). Both samples have comparat
Page 18 and 19: PI = background (rock) resistivity,
Page 20: FIG. 3. A schematic explanation of
Page 24 and 25: CHU the pyrite contents are about t
Page 26 and 27: - E q - r t- > C/) lJJ 0:: - lJJ -"
Page 28: FIG. 9. 20 resistivity model (botto
Page 31: FIG. 10. Fault pattern in survey ar
Page 34 and 35: -500 -400 -300 -200 !o- -100 E ....
Page 37: FIG. 12. Pseudosections resulting f
Page 40 and 41: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS CHU The lab
Page 44: REFERENCES CHU Ballantyne, G. H., 1
Page 48 and 49: CHU generator unit. To reduce elect
Page 51: FIGS. la-le. Phase (mr) field data
Page 54: FIG. 8. 20 model (bottom) for Line

"INDUCED POLARIZATION DATA AT ... - University of Utah

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?