14.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Liste <strong>de</strong>s tableaux<br />

Table 1.1 . Pollen-mediated gene f low (GF) oc curred at t he m aximum di stance f rom pol len<br />

resources of GM oilseed rape (B. napus) ................................................................................ 20<br />

Table 1.2. Long-term persistence of volunteers and feral plants in and/ or outsi<strong>de</strong> of cultivated<br />

fields ......................................................................................................................................... 21<br />

Table 1.3. The relative performance of transgenic crop-wild relative hybrids as compared to<br />

non-transgenci hybrids (modified according to Hails and Morley 2005) ................................ 23<br />

Table 1.4. Long-term introgression of crop alleles into weed populations ............................. 25<br />

Table 1.5. M orphology was us ed t o m easure i ntrogression i n doc umented c ases of n atural<br />

hybridization and introgression of crops and wild relatives (One part of Table 1 in Jarvis and<br />

Hodgkin 1999) .......................................................................................................................... 27<br />

Table 2.1. F-values from a four-way fixed split-plot ANOVA on the fitness of mustard in the<br />

monoculture experiment. .......................................................................................................... 51<br />

Table 2.2. F-values f rom a f ive-way fixed s plit-plot A NOVA on t he fitness of t rF1, nt rF1,<br />

mustard and GT in the multi-culture experiment. .................................................................... 52<br />

Table 2 .3. M ean ( SE) o f p lant ch aracteristics for f our pl ant t ypes i n m ulti-culture tr ial a s<br />

analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD ................................................................... 53<br />

Table 2.4. Reproduction of h ybrids a ccording t o t he pol lination mo<strong>de</strong> ( BC1J a nd B C1N:<br />

backcrosses to B. juncea and B. napus, respectively). ............................................................. 65<br />

Table 2.5. Segregation of herbici<strong>de</strong>-resistant and susceptible plants in BC1N and F2, and Chisquare<br />

(χ 2 ) test against expected Men<strong>de</strong>lian segregation ratio (NS, not significant, p > 0.05) 66<br />

Table 2.6. Percentage of resistant plants in the progeny of susceptible B. napus, BC1N and F2<br />

plants in the field experiment. .................................................................................................. 67<br />

Table 2.7. Mean (±95% CL) of plant weight, seed weight, seed number, per-seed weight and<br />

germination of F2, BC1N and B. napus. .................................................................................. 68<br />

Table 3.1. ANOVA results of the effect of clipping (CP) versus not clipping (NC) leaves and<br />

the pe rcentage of pl ants w ith non -clipped l eaves ( NC), s howing t he F t est va lue a nd i ts<br />

probability P for each test. ....................................................................................................... 86<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!