14.08.2013 Views

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

UNIVERSITE DE BOURGOGNE THÈSE Yongbo LIU - Université de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects of plant <strong>de</strong>nsity Plant <strong>de</strong>nsity significantly affected the performances of the plants:<br />

increased <strong>de</strong> nsity d ecreased num ber of f lowers, bi omass, s eed num ber a nd w eight and<br />

percentage of small seeds, and increased thousand seeds weight and the percentage of large<br />

and medium seeds (Table 2.1, Fig. 2.1). Emergence rate, days to flowering and reproductive<br />

allocation were not affected by plant <strong>de</strong>nsity (Table 2.1).<br />

Performances o f p lants f rom d ifferent s eed ca tegories Seed c ategory s ignificantly<br />

affected the da ys to flowering, number of flowers, thousand-seed weight and percentage of<br />

medium and small seeds (Table 2.1, Fig. 2.1). There were no differences among different seed<br />

categories f or em ergence r ate, b iomass, s eed n umber, r eproductive al location, s eed w eight<br />

and percentage of large seeds (Table 1, Fig. 2.1). Large-see<strong>de</strong>d plants flowered earlier than<br />

small-see<strong>de</strong>d p lants a t a ll th e th ree d ensities ( Fig. 2.1). S mall-see<strong>de</strong>d pl ants pr oduced l ess<br />

flowers a t l ow <strong>de</strong> nsity and m ore s mall s eeds a t low a nd m edium <strong>de</strong> nsity t han l arge-see<strong>de</strong>d<br />

plants, but there was no difference at high d ensity. Thousand s eeds weight in small-see<strong>de</strong>d<br />

plants was lower than that in large-see<strong>de</strong>d plants only at low <strong>de</strong>nsity (Fig. 2.1).<br />

There was no interaction between <strong>de</strong>nsity and s eed category effects for all the fitness<br />

components in this experiment (Table 2.1).<br />

Multi-culture experiment<br />

When consi<strong>de</strong>ring all the conditions, plant <strong>de</strong>nsity significantly affected the emergence rate,<br />

days t o flowering, bi omass, s eed num ber a nd w eight, a nd pe rcentage of l arge a nd m edium<br />

seeds, a nd di d not a ffect r eproductive a llocation, t housand-seed w eight and p ercentage o f<br />

small seeds (Table 2.2). Seed category significantly affected the days to flowering, biomass,<br />

seed number and weight, thousand seeds weight and percentage of small seeds, and it did not<br />

affect the emergence rate, reproductive allocation and percentage of large and medium seeds<br />

(Table 2.2).<br />

There were no interactions between <strong>de</strong>nsity and seed category for all fitness components<br />

except of the reproductive allocation (Table 2.2). Days to flowering, seed weight, thousandseed<br />

w eight a nd pe rcentage of l arge s eeds ha d i nteraction be tween <strong>de</strong> nsity and pl ant t ype.<br />

Days t o f lowering, s eed num ber, r eproductive allocation a nd t housand s eeds w eight ha d<br />

interaction be tween s eed c ategory and pl ant t ype, but i t could b e due t o di fferent<br />

categorization o f t he d ifferent p lant t ypes ( i.e. s eed s ize cr iteria w ere d ifferent). N o<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!