15.08.2013 Views

STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH ... - Law Commission

STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH ... - Law Commission

STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART IX<br />

<strong>STATUTE</strong>S<br />

156 Group 1- Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts<br />

9.1 Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts were the predecessors of the modern Statute <strong>Law</strong><br />

(Repeals) Acts. Their purpose was to repeal enactments which, upon specified<br />

grounds, were considered no longer to be effectively in force. The grounds in<br />

question were that the enactments were obsolete, expired, superseded, spent,<br />

virtually repealed or repealed in general terms, or were unnecessary. 1 Thirty-five<br />

Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts were passed between 1861 and 1908. One further<br />

was enacted in 1927 and from 1948 to 1966 another series was enacted.<br />

Thereafter they were effectively replaced by Statute <strong>Law</strong> (Repeals) Acts<br />

proposed by the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s under powers provided by the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong>s Act 1965. Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts continued to be promoted in<br />

respect of Northern Ireland until 1980. 2<br />

9.2 The drafting of Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts adopted a standard format. Each Act<br />

would contain a Schedule listing the enactments being repealed, together with<br />

one or more sections to give effect to the repeals. Each Act would also include a<br />

saving provision to which the enactments specified in the Schedule were subject.<br />

This saving provision became known as the Westbury saving. 3 The most simple<br />

form of the saving can be found in the 1861 Act, but it became increasingly more<br />

elaborate with every subsequent Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Act until it reached its final<br />

form in the Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision (No.2) Act 1888. 4 It is to be found in every such<br />

Act up until and including 1953. 5 Thereafter, responsibility for drafting these Acts<br />

was passed to the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel, whose draftsman<br />

decided that the Westbury saving was no longer required because reliance could<br />

be placed on the general savings provisions of section 38 of the Interpretation<br />

Act 1889. 6 Accordingly the Westbury saving was omitted from the Statute <strong>Law</strong><br />

Revision Act 1958 7 and from all subsequent Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision and Statute<br />

<strong>Law</strong> (Repeals) Acts.<br />

9.3 The repeals schedules of the Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Acts have now mostly been<br />

repealed themselves, many of them by the Statute <strong>Law</strong> (Repeals) Act 1974.<br />

However, it has in the past proved difficult to repeal the Westbury saving in each<br />

Act, mainly because of the difficulty of ascertaining which of the repealed<br />

1<br />

These grounds, and their technical meanings, were set out in a memorandum appended to<br />

the Bill for each Act.<br />

2 SLR (Northern Ireland) Acts 1973, 1976, 1980.<br />

3 Named after Lord Westbury who was responsible for its development.<br />

4 51 & 52 Vict c.57 (repealed by the SL(R) Act 1989).<br />

5 2 & 3 Eliz.2 c.5.<br />

6 See further the minutes of evidence published with the Seventh Report of the Joint<br />

Committee on Consolidation and Statute <strong>Law</strong> Revision Bills for the session 1957-1958 (HL<br />

Papers (1957-1958) Nos 5-VI, 108-I; HC Paper (1957-1958) No 209-I). The Interpretation<br />

Act 1889 has been repealed and the relevant provisions are now contained in s.16 of the<br />

Interpretation Act 1978.<br />

7 6 & 7 Eliz.2 c.46.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!