17.08.2013 Views

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The number of treatments and percentage that are LLETZ has remained fairly constant.<br />

LLETZ has been shown to have less morbidity than other forms of treatment, and should<br />

be the treatment of choice. All methods are excisional and therefore provide histology,<br />

and ablative treatments are not performed. The diathermy included in the table was not<br />

for treatment of cervical neoplasia, but treatment of a bleeding ectropion. Eighty-five<br />

percent of LLETZ were performed in the clinic and under local anaesthesia.<br />

In 2009 no patient under the age of 20 underwent treatment for abnormal smears. One<br />

woman was treated under the age of 20 in <strong>2010</strong> and 31 women under the age of 25<br />

were treated. Conservative management after MDM review of women under the age of<br />

25 presenting with biopsy proven CIN2 is expected standard management at NW. The<br />

policy also requires discussion at a Multidisciplinary Meeting and compulsory pathology<br />

review of all patients considered for treatment under the age of 20.<br />

As there is increasing evidence that even one treatment can have a detrimental effect on<br />

future pregnancies, review of all cases under the age of 25 should be considered. This<br />

is reasonable considering WHO recommendations that screening should start at 25,<br />

given the low prevalence of cervical cancer before this age.<br />

12.8.1 Post treatment follow up<br />

Colposcopy Standard: Follow up after treatment Standard<br />

NW<br />

2008<br />

NW<br />

2009<br />

NW<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Indicator Definition % % % %<br />

Numerator<br />

Follow up visit no later than 8 months following<br />

treatment<br />

>90 88 88 81<br />

Denominator All treatments<br />

Table 122: Timing of follow up colposcopy after treatments (2007-2009)<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

N=191<br />

N=213<br />

N=199<br />

n % n % n %<br />

< 8 months 168 88.0 182 85.5 162 81.4<br />

> 8 months 3 1.6 3 1.4 4 2.0<br />

No follow up 20 10.5 28 13.2 33 16.6<br />

There has been a drop in this indicator in <strong>2010</strong>. Those cases outside the recommended<br />

indicator will be reviewed.<br />

Colposcopy Standards: Dyskaryosis* after treatment Standard NW<br />

2008<br />

NW<br />

2009<br />

NW<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Indicator Definition % % % %<br />

Numerator<br />

Treated women with no dyskaryosis* following<br />

treatment<br />

>90% 90 92 76<br />

Denominator All treatments<br />

*HSIL or LSIL on cytology<br />

The decline in this indicator is of concern to the service and will be reviewed.<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!