17.08.2013 Views

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

National Women's Annual Clinical Report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4 Diabetes<br />

Methods<br />

The data in this section relate to women with a diagnosis of pre-existing or gestational<br />

diabetes who birthed at <strong>National</strong> Women’s in <strong>2010</strong>. It includes women who were cared for<br />

solely by the <strong>National</strong> Women’s Diabetes Clinic, women with some input from the<br />

Diabetes Clinic while under the care of non-Diabetes Clinic LMC, and women with no<br />

Diabetes Clinic input. It does not include women cared for by the Diabetes Clinic who<br />

birthed prior to 20 weeks or who birthed elsewhere.<br />

Findings<br />

In addition to these data the diabetes service had 56 referrals for pre-pregnancy<br />

counselling. We saw 38 of the pre-pregnancy referrals, but 18 remain unseen because we<br />

have not had the capacity to review them. Also 30 other women were booked into clinic<br />

but their data are not shown as they either miscarried or transferred elsewhere for<br />

birthing.<br />

The ongoing rise in women with GDM probably reflects an increased uptake of testing for<br />

GDM plus the change in population demographics with increased rates of obesity and<br />

type 2 diabetes at younger ages.<br />

Last year we commented that new international guidelines for testing for diabetes in<br />

pregnancy had been published, which would lead to more women being diagnosed with<br />

GDM, as the recommendations had a lower glucose cut off for the diagnosis of GDM than<br />

current NZ criteria. In Auckland, we have not changed to the new criteria, as we are<br />

struggling to provide adequate care for women who are diagnosed by our current criteria.<br />

We have continued to work on developing models of care so that some women can be<br />

cared for in community clinics in the future. Education and training of clinicians to provide<br />

this care is a priority. Hopefully, we can then have discussions about whether to adopt the<br />

new criteria over the next 12 months.<br />

GDM<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

GDM Type I Type 2<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 25: Incidence of diabetes (% of all inborn and BBA births) (1991-<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

56<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Type 1<br />

and 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!