18.08.2013 Views

Kana et al. 1988. S. Carolina Charleston SLR Case Study

Kana et al. 1988. S. Carolina Charleston SLR Case Study

Kana et al. 1988. S. Carolina Charleston SLR Case Study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the mean tide range of 156 cm (5.2 ft) in <strong>Charleston</strong> and given as a cumulative probability<br />

distribution. These graphs are applicable to much of the southeastern U.S. coast by substituting<br />

different tide ranges. Each graph provides a measure of the duration of time over the year that<br />

various w<strong>et</strong>land elevations are underwater.<br />

In the case of S<strong>al</strong>icomia virginica (+3.16 ft for <strong>Charleston</strong>), the cumulative frequency of<br />

flooding is approximately 4 percent (Figure 2-7B and Appendix 2,A). If one wanted to apply<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!