validation of caa prediction of noise radi- ated from turbofan intakes
validation of caa prediction of noise radi- ated from turbofan intakes
validation of caa prediction of noise radi- ated from turbofan intakes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Kraków, Poland, 5–9 July 2009<br />
6. Conclusions<br />
The authors draw the following conclusions <strong>from</strong> this study.<br />
• That accurate absolute <strong>prediction</strong>s <strong>of</strong> far field SPL and field shapes due to BPF tones are possible<br />
for realistic intake geometries and flows in the absence <strong>of</strong> liners provided that the source<br />
modal content is correctly specified.<br />
• That the <strong>prediction</strong> <strong>of</strong> attenu<strong>ated</strong> tone field shapes for lined <strong>intakes</strong> requires accurate impedance<br />
data and the inclusion at supersonic fan tip speeds <strong>of</strong> adjustments to account for non-linear<br />
propagation close to the fan.<br />
7. Acknowledgements<br />
This work is supported by Rolls-Royce plc and undertaken within the Rolls-Royce University<br />
Technology Centre in Gas Turbine Noise at the University <strong>of</strong> Southampton (UoS). The second author<br />
is supported also by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) within<br />
the Engineering Doctorate programme at the UoS. The authors are indebted to Dr. Alan McAlpine<br />
who provided modal decay rates for use in the FDNS calculation.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1 S. Lidoine, H.T.S. Batard and A. Delnevo. “Acoustic <strong>radi</strong>ation modelling <strong>of</strong> aeroengine Intake,<br />
comparison between analytical and numerical methods,” AIAA paper 2001-2140, 2001.<br />
2 W. Eversman, “Mapped infinite wave envelope elements for acoustic <strong>radi</strong>ation in a uniformly<br />
moving medium”, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 224, 1999, pp. 665 – 87.<br />
3 ACTRAN 2006 User’s Manual, Free Field Technologies, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 2006.<br />
4 A. McAlpine and M.J. Fisher. On the <strong>prediction</strong> <strong>of</strong> “buzz-saw” <strong>noise</strong> in acoustically lined aeroengine<br />
inlet ducts. J. Sound Vib., 265(1):175-200, 2003.<br />
5<br />
R. J. Astley, G. J. Macaulay, J-P Coyette and L. Cremers. "Three-dimensional wave-envelope<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> variable order for acoustic <strong>radi</strong>ation and scattering. Part I. Formulation in the frequency<br />
domain". JASA, Vol 103(1) 1998, pp 49-63.<br />
6<br />
Myers, K.K., “On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence <strong>of</strong> flow,” J. Sound Vib., Vol.<br />
71, 1980, pp. 429 – 434.<br />
7<br />
E.R. Rademaker, P. Sijtsma, B.J. Tester. “Mode detection with an optimised array in model turb<strong>of</strong>an<br />
engine intake at varying shaft speeds”, AIAA paper 2001-2181, NLR-TP-2001-132, 2001.<br />
8<br />
Far-field SPL / dB<br />
10 dB<br />
Measured: Hard-walled<br />
Measured: Lined<br />
Predicted: Hard-walled<br />
Predicted: Lined<br />
Predicted: Lined, N.L. effects + 4% B.L.<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Angle <strong>from</strong> intake axis / degrees<br />
Figure 8. Comparisons <strong>of</strong> measured and predicted far-field sound pressure levels for hard-walled and lined<br />
configurations showing the effect <strong>of</strong> a boundary layer and non-linear propagation on the attenuation <strong>of</strong> EO<br />
modes at 1BPF at 90% fan speed.