Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Hearing Research Manuscript Draft ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure(s) Click here to download high resolution image
Table(s) Table 1. Cochlear implant users’ clinical profile Stimulation rate (Pulses/s/chan.) Sound level (dB SPL) Score (% correct) CI use (months) Sound coding strategy Age Implantation (months) Duration deafness (months) Age (years) CI user Processor Device CI side Gender 900 65 93 45 ACE ESPrit 3G Nucleus 622 150 Right Male 55 01 720 65 90 54 ACE ESPrit 3G Nucleus 704 568 Right Male 63 02 1200 80 42 33 ACE Freedom Nuclues 899 265 Left Male 77 03 1200 75 93 22 ACE Freedom Nucleus 627 614 Left Male 54 04 1200 75 91 78 ACE ESPrit 3G Nucleus 771 531 Left Female 70 05 900 65 91 46 ACE ESPrit 3G Nucleus 837 693 Right Male 73 06 1200 65 62 21 ACE Freedom Nucleus 718 478 Left Female 61 07 250 70 83 156 SPEAK ESPrit 3G Nucleus 572 416 Left Male 60 08 900 70 66 51 ACE ESPrit 3G Nucleus 896 30 Left Male 79 09 3712 75 99 35 HiRes-S AB Auria ABS 491 251 Left * Female 43 10 1200 70 53 80 ACE CI24M Nucleus 883 631 Left Female 80 11 900 60 51 28 ACE Freedom Nucleus 447 447 Left Female 39 12 2656 65 99 12 HiRes-S AB Harmony ABS 679 403 Left Female 57 13 3712 75 97 6 HiRes-S AB Harmony ABS 692 452 Right Male 58 14 1200 70 88 18 ACE Freedom Nucleus 682 41 Right Female 58 15 884 70 48 8 HiRes-S AB Harmony ABS 390 378 Left Female 33 16 1515 75 93 18 FSP Medel Opus2 Med El 446 230 Left Female 38 18 1515 70 97 10 FSP Medel Opus2 Med El 741 417 Right Female 62 19 *Subject was implanted bilaterally. Device names and processor names according to manufacture’s labeling. Sound coding strategies legend: advanced combination encoders (ACE), spectral peak coding (SPEAK), high resolution with fidelity 120 (HiRes-S), fine structure processing (FSP). Score corresponds to the percentage correct on the Bam<strong>for</strong>d-Kowal-Bench (BKB) speech recognition test in quiet.
Page 1 and 2: Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for H
Page 3 and 4: *Response to Reviewers Dear Dr. Can
Page 5 and 6: 8) Lines 137-138. Include a figure
Page 7 and 8: confident that the same thresholds
Page 9 and 10: eason to require a window of intere
Page 11 and 12: location information pointing consi
Page 13 and 14: As requested we show in the next fi
Page 15 and 16: 2011, Neuroimage, for an unfair com
Page 17 and 18: *Highlights Highlights New algorit
Page 19 and 20: 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Page 21 and 22: 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
Page 23 and 24: 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144
Page 25 and 26: 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197
Page 27 and 28: 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Page 29 and 30: 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
Page 31 and 32: 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356
Page 33 and 34: 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410
Page 35 and 36: 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466
Page 37 and 38: 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519
Page 39 and 40: Figure(s) Click here to download hi
Page 41: Figure(s) Click here to download hi

Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Hearing Research Manuscript Draft ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?