To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Summary of Significant Changes by Major Program Areas 56 • • five days after the state budget is adopted and August 15. However, this window leaves districts little time to appropriately plan layoffs even when the state budget is adopted on time in June. If the state budget is adopted or amended after July, these provisions effectively prohibit districts from implementing layoffs. As a result, districts are forced to assume the worst, over-notify teachers, proceed with the time-consuming and expensive layoff process and then, after the state adopts its budget, rescind the notifications and attempt to rehire teachers who really should not have been notified in the first place. This process causes unnecessary anxiety for teachers, makes it difficult for principals and teachers to plan for the coming school year, and disrupts schools’ efforts to improve student achievement. School Year — Schools will continue to be provided flexibility through 2012-13 to reduce instruction by up to five days, if necessary, to accommodate the reductions made in 2009-10 without losing any incentive funding they receive to maintain a 180-day school year. Comprehensive Reforms — The Administration will also consider additional reforms to the state’s public school system to augment the fiscal reforms identified above and build on the spirit of reform embodied in President Obama’s Race to the Top initiative. These reforms, among others, will address statutory and regulatory barriers which hinder districts from focusing on needed improvements to student achievement and increasing the number of high quality schools and highly effective teachers and principals. 2009-10 The significant General Fund workload adjustments for K-12 entities are as follows: • • • Property Tax — An increase of $234 million for school district and county office of education revenue limits as a result of a decrease in offsetting property tax revenue. Average Daily Attendance — A decrease of $229.3 million for school district and county office of education revenue limits from a decrease in average daily attendance and unemployment insurance and retirement costs. Restoration of Categorical Funds — A decrease of $14.3 million because the amount needed to make schools whole for the categorical funds swept in 2008-09 was lower than anticipated. Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11
• Summary of Significant Changes by Major Program Areas State-Operated-Programs — A decrease of $17.8 million to reflect lower education program costs for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Juvenile Justice Division and the Department of Education State Special Schools. The major General Fund workload adjustments for Child Care are as follows: • CalWORKs Child Care Adjustments — A decrease of $12.4 million to reflect expected savings in CalWORKs Stage 2 Child Care ($9 million) and CalWORKs Stage 3 ($3.4 million) caseload-driven programs based on revised estimates. The major General Fund workload adjustments for Community Colleges are as follows: • Offsetting General Fund Revenue Adjustments — Although current year property tax estimates increased by $6.3 million, student fees and oil and mineral estimates decrease by $9.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively. As a result, the base apportionment deficit increases slightly from $58 million to $63.1 million. Classroom funding is protected to the maximum extent possible in 2009-10 by achieving savings through the following: • Class Size Reduction Program Savings — A reduction of $340 million to reflect projected savings in the K-3 Class Size Reduction program. Although the penalties for exceeding class size limits were significantly reduced in 2009-10, program savings are anticipated as a result of local school district decisions to increase class sizes. 2010-11 The significant General Fund workload adjustments for K-12 entities are as follows: • • Property Tax — An increase of $1.5 billion for school district and county office of education revenue limits and special education program costs, which reflects a decrease in offsetting property tax revenue. Average Daily Attendance — A net decrease of $27.3 million for school district and county office of education revenue limits, nutrition program and special education program costs as a result of lower average daily attendance and unemployment insurance and retirement costs. Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11 57
Page 1:
To e California Legislatu Regular S
Page 5:
Dear Governor: DEPARTMENT OF FINANC
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction In 2009, the United St
Page 11 and 12:
150,000 140,000 130,000 120,000 110
Page 13 and 14: Reforming the Federal-State Relatio
Page 15 and 16: Trigger Reductions and Revenues The
Page 17: The Governor’s Budget projects th
Page 20 and 21: Summary Charts 12 Figure SUM-01 201
Page 22 and 23: Summary Charts 14 Personal Income T
Page 24 and 25: Summary Charts 16 Corrections and R
Page 26 and 27: Summary of Significant Changes by M
Page 79 and 80: Economic Outlook Governor’s Budge
Page 81 and 82: 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% -2.0% -4.0% -6.
Page 83 and 84: California personal income fell sha
Page 85 and 86: Revenue Estimates The revenue estim
Page 87 and 88: Figure REV-01 displays the forecast
Page 89 and 90: General Fund Revenue General Fund 2
Page 91 and 92: The budget’s revenue estimates in
Page 93 and 94: and $4.456 billion in 2010-11. The
Page 95 and 96: Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11
Page 97 and 98: Corporation Tax Corporation tax rev
Page 99 and 100: In 2008, $123.5 billion in taxable
Page 101 and 102: Property Taxes Article XIIIA of the
Page 103 and 104: Other Revenues Governor’s Budget
Page 105 and 106: Chapter 322, Statutes of 1998 estab
Page 107: containing 15 percent or less gasol
Page 111 and 112: Appendices and Schedules
Page 113 and 114: Statewide Financial Information Pro
Page 115 and 116:
Reference to Schedule General Fund
Page 117 and 118:
Fiscal Estate Alcoholic Motor Year
Page 119 and 120:
Positions subject to Administration
Page 121 and 122:
SCHEDULE 5B ACTUAL 2008-09 FISCAL Y
Page 123 and 124:
SCHEDULE 5D ESTIMATED 2010-11 FISCA
Page 125 and 126:
SCHEDULE 8 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF
Page 127 and 128:
SCHEDULE 8 -- Continued COMPARATIVE
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
SCHEDULE 9 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
SCHEDULE 10 -- Continued SUMMARY OF
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
SCHEDULE 11 STATEMENT OF GENERAL OB
Page 163 and 164:
SCHEDULE 12B REVENUES TO EXCLUDED F
Page 165 and 166:
SCHEDULE 12C NON-TAX REVENUES IN FU
Page 167 and 168:
From Corporations Fund, State (0067
Page 169 and 170:
Finance Glossary of Accounting and
Page 171 and 172:
Augmentation An authorized increase
Page 173 and 174:
Budget Revision (BR) A document, us
Page 175 and 176:
appeal to continue the positions. I
Page 177 and 178:
expenditure totals the amount of en
Page 179 and 180:
Fiscal Committees Committees of mem
Page 181 and 182:
Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO
Page 183 and 184:
Overhead Those elements of cost nec
Page 185 and 186:
(K-14) beginning with fiscal year 1
Page 187 and 188:
savings is estimated on the basis o
Page 189 and 190:
Senate The upper house of Californi
Page 191 and 192:
such that interference with a contr
show all

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?