To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Summary of Significant Changes by Major Program Areas 62 Labor and Workforce Development General Fund expenditures are proposed to decrease by $3.4 million, or 5.5 percent. The significant General Fund workload adjustments are as follows: • • Automated Collection Enhancement System — An increase of $24.6 million to implement the Employment Development Department’s Automated Collection Enhancement System (ACES). The tax revenue increase associated with implementation of ACES is estimated to be $42.1 million General Fund for 2010-11. This project will also result in non-General Fund expenditures and revenue increases. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement Fund Shift — A reduction of $21.6 million General Fund to be replaced with $21.7 million from the Labor Compliance and Enforcement Fund for the full-year implementation of increased employer fees established in 2009-10. Non-General Fund expenditures are proposed to decrease by $4.3 billion, or 13.9 percent. The significant non-General Fund workload adjustments are as follows: • • Employment Development Department October Benefit Estimate — The October Revise reflects Unemployment Insurance benefit payment decreases of $6.8 billion in the current year and $11.6 billion in the budget year and a Disability Insurance benefit payment decrease of $42.4 million in the current year and an increase of $341 million in the budget year when compared to the May 2009 estimate. While the number of individuals receiving benefits has continued to increase, the May 2009 benefit payments were overestimated; these adjustments project the updated estimated need for benefit payments. Employment Opportunities Initiative – An increase of $230 million to the Employment Training Panel (ETP) to implement a program to assist employers and employees to rebuild California’s workforce. Of these funds, $140 million will be available to employers and training providers that deliver training for unemployed and underemployed individuals, as well as for employment expansion and job retention. Reimbursement for the cost of training would be provided after the person has been gainfully employed for three months and would be calculated based on current ETP reimbursement rates. The balance of $90 million would be available to provide a $3,000 incentive to employers to hire and retain an unemployed individual. To be eligible for the Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11
Summary of Significant Changes by Major Program Areas incentive, the employee must be retained for a total of nine months. Over the life of this initiative a total of $500 million will be provided to expand employment opportunities in California resulting in 140,000 individuals obtaining higher paying jobs and providing 100,000 currently unemployed individuals with a job. General Government: Non-Agency Departments General Fund expenditures are proposed to increase by $41.6 million, or 8.7 percent. The significant General Fund workload adjustments are as follows: • • • Veterans Homes — An increase of $8.3 million and 97.2 positions to activate business operations and begin admissions at the Veterans Homes in West Los Angeles, Lancaster, and Ventura (GLAVC). An additional $11.7 million is provided for the full-year cost of the GLAVC implementation which began in 2009-10. Veterans Homes — An increase of $2.4 million and 16.9 positions to ensure that all aspects of construction and business operations are compliant with federal, state, and local laws at the Veterans Homes in Redding and Fresno. Mandate Payments — An increase of $236 million for state reimbursable mandates, consisting of $141 million for current mandates and $95 million for the 2010-11 payment of the mandates obligation for costs incurred prior to 2004-05. The significant General Fund budget solutions are as follows: • Reductions • • • Suspend Mandates — A one-time reduction of $137 million by suspending most mandates not related to elections, law enforcement, or property taxes, consistent with mandate suspensions included in the Amended 2009 Budget Act. Mandate Deferral — A one-time reduction of $95 million by deferring the 2010-11 payment of mandates obligation for costs incurred prior to 2004-05, which are statutorily required to be completely paid by 2020-21. The balance will be refinanced over the remaining payment period. California Law Revision Commission and Commission on Uniform State Laws — A reduction of $666,000 for the California Law Revision Commission and Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11 63
Page 1:
To e California Legislatu Regular S
Page 5:
Dear Governor: DEPARTMENT OF FINANC
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction In 2009, the United St
Page 11 and 12:
150,000 140,000 130,000 120,000 110
Page 13 and 14:
Reforming the Federal-State Relatio
Page 15 and 16:
Trigger Reductions and Revenues The
Page 17:
The Governor’s Budget projects th
Page 20 and 21: Summary Charts 12 Figure SUM-01 201
Page 22 and 23: Summary Charts 14 Personal Income T
Page 24 and 25: Summary Charts 16 Corrections and R
Page 26 and 27: Summary of Significant Changes by M
Page 79 and 80: Economic Outlook Governor’s Budge
Page 81 and 82: 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% -2.0% -4.0% -6.
Page 83 and 84: California personal income fell sha
Page 85 and 86: Revenue Estimates The revenue estim
Page 87 and 88: Figure REV-01 displays the forecast
Page 89 and 90: General Fund Revenue General Fund 2
Page 91 and 92: The budget’s revenue estimates in
Page 93 and 94: and $4.456 billion in 2010-11. The
Page 95 and 96: Governor’s Budget Summary 2010-11
Page 97 and 98: Corporation Tax Corporation tax rev
Page 99 and 100: In 2008, $123.5 billion in taxable
Page 101 and 102: Property Taxes Article XIIIA of the
Page 103 and 104: Other Revenues Governor’s Budget
Page 105 and 106: Chapter 322, Statutes of 1998 estab
Page 107: containing 15 percent or less gasol
Page 111 and 112: Appendices and Schedules
Page 113 and 114: Statewide Financial Information Pro
Page 115 and 116: Reference to Schedule General Fund
Page 117 and 118: Fiscal Estate Alcoholic Motor Year
Page 119 and 120: Positions subject to Administration
Page 121 and 122:
SCHEDULE 5B ACTUAL 2008-09 FISCAL Y
Page 123 and 124:
SCHEDULE 5D ESTIMATED 2010-11 FISCA
Page 125 and 126:
SCHEDULE 8 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF
Page 127 and 128:
SCHEDULE 8 -- Continued COMPARATIVE
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
SCHEDULE 9 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
SCHEDULE 10 -- Continued SUMMARY OF
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
SCHEDULE 11 STATEMENT OF GENERAL OB
Page 163 and 164:
SCHEDULE 12B REVENUES TO EXCLUDED F
Page 165 and 166:
SCHEDULE 12C NON-TAX REVENUES IN FU
Page 167 and 168:
From Corporations Fund, State (0067
Page 169 and 170:
Finance Glossary of Accounting and
Page 171 and 172:
Augmentation An authorized increase
Page 173 and 174:
Budget Revision (BR) A document, us
Page 175 and 176:
appeal to continue the positions. I
Page 177 and 178:
expenditure totals the amount of en
Page 179 and 180:
Fiscal Committees Committees of mem
Page 181 and 182:
Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO
Page 183 and 184:
Overhead Those elements of cost nec
Page 185 and 186:
(K-14) beginning with fiscal year 1
Page 187 and 188:
savings is estimated on the basis o
Page 189 and 190:
Senate The upper house of Californi
Page 191 and 192:
such that interference with a contr
show all

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?