18.08.2013 Views

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Corporation Tax<br />

Corporation tax revenues are expected to contribute 11.3 percent of all General Fund<br />

revenues and transfers <strong>in</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>-11. Corporation tax revenues are expected to drop<br />

about 1.4 percent from 2008-09 to <strong>2009</strong>-<strong>10</strong> but<br />

then recover <strong>in</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>-11. Revenues from this<br />

source are expected to grow by 6.9 percent for<br />

the budget year. Corporation tax revenues are<br />

driven by corporate profits, which generally track<br />

the overall bus<strong>in</strong>ess cycle. In the budget year,<br />

revenues will <strong>in</strong>crease as a result of higher penalties<br />

on large corporations that under-report <strong>in</strong>come<br />

and underpay taxes. Revenues will decrease as<br />

a result of the impacts of budget actions taken <strong>in</strong><br />

earlier years. These factors <strong>in</strong>clude an end to the temporary suspension of net operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Governor’s Budget Summary 20<strong>10</strong>-11<br />

Revenue Estimates<br />

loss claims, <strong>in</strong>creased ability to claim various credits among members of a u<strong>ni</strong>tary groups<br />

and adoption of s<strong>in</strong>gle sales factor <strong>in</strong>come apportionment.<br />

Corporation tax revenues are derived from the follow<strong>in</strong>g sources:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Corporation Tax Revenue<br />

(In Billions)<br />

2008-09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.536<br />

<strong>2009</strong>-<strong>10</strong> (Forecast) . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.407<br />

20<strong>10</strong>-11 (Forecast). ..........$<strong>10</strong>.052<br />

The franchise tax and the corporate <strong>in</strong>come tax are levied at a rate of 8.84 percent<br />

on net profits. The former is imposed on corporations that do bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> Califor<strong>ni</strong>a,<br />

while the latter is imposed on corporations that derive <strong>in</strong>come from Califor<strong>ni</strong>a<br />

sources without do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> the state. For example, a corporation that<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a stock of goods <strong>in</strong> Califor<strong>ni</strong>a to fill orders taken by <strong>in</strong>dependent dealers<br />

would be subject to the corporate <strong>in</strong>come tax.<br />

Corporations that have a limited number of shareholders and meet other<br />

requirements to qualify for state Subchapter S status are taxed at a 1.5-percent rate<br />

rather than the 8.84 percent imposed on other corporations.<br />

Banks and other f<strong>in</strong>ancial corporations pay the franchise tax plus an additional<br />

2-percent tax on net <strong>in</strong>come. This “bank tax” is <strong>in</strong> lieu of local personal property and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess license taxes.<br />

The alternative mi<strong>ni</strong>mum tax is similar to that imposed under federal law. Levied<br />

at a rate of 6.65 percent, the alternative mi<strong>ni</strong>mum tax ensures that corporate<br />

taxpayers do not make excessive use of deductions and exemptions to avoid pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a mi<strong>ni</strong>mum level of tax.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!