18.08.2013 Views

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

To e Cai ni Legislatu Regula S in 2009-10 - Streetsblog San Francisco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of Sig<strong>ni</strong>ficant Changes by Major Program Areas<br />

Employee compensation reductions <strong>in</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>-11, as outl<strong>in</strong>ed below, result <strong>in</strong> a sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of $1.6 billion General Fund. These moneys will be removed from department budgets<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g forward.<br />

With the restoration of $1.1 billion General Fund to department budgets and the reduction<br />

of $1.6 billion General Fund, a net additional decrease of $489.9 million General Fund is<br />

reflected <strong>in</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>-11.<br />

The sig<strong>ni</strong>ficant General Fund budget solutions are as follows:<br />

•<br />

Reductions<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Workforce Cap — A reduction of $449.6 million achieved through a five-percent<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> salary sav<strong>in</strong>gs. An Executive Order will require that Agency<br />

Secretaries and Department Directors immediately act to achieve the<br />

five-percent reduction by July 1, 20<strong>10</strong>. It is expected that attrition will be the<br />

primary factor <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>creased salary sav<strong>in</strong>gs. The constitutional<br />

offices are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the workforce cap because the fiscal year <strong>2009</strong>-20<strong>10</strong><br />

budget for each of those officers <strong>in</strong>cluded a permanent reduction that achieves<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs to the level of the workforce cap or a higher amount.<br />

Five-Percent Salary Reduction — A reduction of $529.6 million achieved through<br />

an across-the-board reduction <strong>in</strong> salaries by five percent.<br />

Increased Employee Retirement Contribution — A reduction of $405.8 million<br />

achieved by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g employees’ retirement contribution by 5 percent and<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g the employer contribution accord<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

Lower Cost Health Care — A reduction of $152.8 million <strong>in</strong> health care costs<br />

beg<strong>in</strong><strong>ni</strong>ng <strong>in</strong> January 2011 achieved by contract<strong>in</strong>g for lower-cost health care<br />

coverage either directly from an <strong>in</strong>surer or through CalPERS. Sav<strong>in</strong>gs beg<strong>in</strong><strong>ni</strong>ng<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2011-12 will pre-fund other post-employment benefit costs.<br />

Pre-fund<strong>in</strong>g for Health and Dental Benefits for Annuitants — A decrease of<br />

$98.1 million for pre-fund<strong>in</strong>g other post-employment benefits.<br />

Governor’s Budget Summary 20<strong>10</strong>-11<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!