20.08.2013 Views

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure-16, MPX Peak Control, SSBSC<br />

Figure-17, MPX Spectra, SSBSC<br />

TECHTALK BLOG<br />

TELOSALLIANCE.COM/BLOG<br />

SSBSC AND DECODED SIGNAL-TO-NOISE<br />

Another known challenge for the system is the compromised sig-<br />

nal-to-noise (SNR) level when broadcasting stereo. FM transmis-<br />

sion noise will rise in a triangular fashion at 6dB per octave over<br />

the channel’s passband range of 0Hz-99kHz. This is the product<br />

of the modulation/demodulation process. The use of preempha-<br />

sis in transmission, along with complementary deemphasis in<br />

demodulation, improves the high frequency noise response. It<br />

has been generally accepted that FM-Stereo suffers a 23dB over-<br />

all noise penalty compared to monophonic broadcasting. This is<br />

due to the rising noise loor over the subcarrier range of 23kHz<br />

– 53kHz, as compared to the SNR over the range of 0Hz – 15kHz,<br />

which is used for mono. Figure–18 is an illustration of the com-<br />

posite baseband signal, and it shows the 6dB/octave noise loor<br />

slope of an FM channel, as it would appear at the output of an IF<br />

section in a receiver.<br />

Figure-18, FM System Noise Plot<br />

BROCHURES<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/BROCHURES<br />

SOFTWARE UPDATES<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/SOFTWARE<br />

It has been theoretically calculated [5], and technically demon-<br />

strated, there is roughly a 4dB broadband improvement in recov-<br />

ered signal-to-noise performance of the SSBSC transmit/receive<br />

function, as compared to the conventional DSB transmit/receive<br />

iteration. When transmitting SSBSC, and decoding only the lower<br />

sideband spectra (23kHz – 38kHz), an interesting event occurs.<br />

Stereophonic noise is about 10dB better for decoded 15kHz. This<br />

is due to the frequency inversion of the lower sideband. The tri-<br />

angular noise is lower at 23kHz, where 15kHz resides in the lower<br />

sideband region of the L-R signal, as compared to lower frequen-<br />

cies, which are located near 38kHz and triangular noise is greater.<br />

Figure-19 is the recovered noise loor of a DSBSC transmission/<br />

reception. Compare the amplitude of the noise loor at 15kHz in<br />

this igure with that of Figure-20, which is the recovered noise<br />

loor of a SSBSC transmit/receive system.<br />

Figure-19, Recovered Noise, DSB<br />

Figure-20, Recovered Noise, SSB<br />

Consider the annoying hiss a listener hears at the output of the<br />

FM receiver. The predominant range of audible hiss is the high<br />

frequencies. As observed in Figure-18, there’s an improvement<br />

of 10dB in signal-to-noise in the audible hiss range. Hopefully,<br />

this might encourage receiver manufacturers to consider adding<br />

SSB decoding into conventional receivers. The above test results<br />

were realized using a SSBSC stereo decoder designed and imple-<br />

mented, real time, in MatLab by the author.<br />

FIND A DEALER<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/BUY<br />

AUDIO PROCESSING | FM | FM+HD | AM | MULTICASTING | CODED AUDIO | STUDIO APPLICATIONS<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!