20.08.2013 Views

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

» Stereo FM<br />

TECHTALK BLOG<br />

TELOSALLIANCE.COM/BLOG<br />

» SCA subcarriers (including digital SCAs)<br />

» RBDS digital subcarriers<br />

» Extended Hybrid IBOC sidebands<br />

SSBSC generates modulation peak overshoots and increased<br />

sideband amplitudes, at least theoretically, which may increase<br />

audio distortion of the demodulated FM signal under multi-<br />

path reception conditions. It is essential, then, to test the above<br />

transmission modes with multipath propagation. NPR Labs has<br />

worked extensively with both over-the-air and laboratory-simu-<br />

lated multipath; in our experience, laboratory simulated multi-<br />

path can be made indistinguishable from over-the-air multipath<br />

conditions, and they avoid the signal instability, environmental<br />

noise and signal interference that hinder the accurate com-<br />

parisons. These other degradations can be added in controlled<br />

amounts to the receiver under test, if desired, although they do<br />

not appear to be necessary for this testing.<br />

The dificulty with ixed multipath scenarios, whether over-the-<br />

air (stationary) or simulated, is that they represent only one<br />

condition, requiring measurements or audio sample recordings<br />

with many separate amplitudes and phases of the “paths” to<br />

represent the scenario. NPR Labs has been successful in putting<br />

the scenario “into motion,” causing the scenario to pass through<br />

many combinations of amplitudes and phases within one time<br />

interval of the multipath simulator. Multipath proiles should<br />

include an urban condition (short path delays with higher ampli-<br />

tudes), rural (longer path delays with lower amplitudes relative<br />

to the direct path) and a no-multipath condition.<br />

The time interval of the multipath simulator, including multipath<br />

fading, can provide an audio sample for assessment by listeners<br />

in a controlled subjective test. Listeners provide the basis for fair<br />

and understandable ratings of reception quality. NPR Labs has<br />

also used Fast Fourier Transform analysis to produce frequency<br />

distribution histograms from digital (wave ile) recordings of<br />

the multipath interval, thereby providing an objective measure<br />

of the distortion products. Either method is appropriate to this<br />

study: the listener-based tests are more expensive but simpler to<br />

interpret, while the FFT analysis is faster and permits more con-<br />

ditions to be tested.<br />

It is important to test reception compatibility with a variety of<br />

receivers, as the impacts may vary with the internal architec-<br />

ture and performance of the receiver. A test matrix involving the<br />

quality rating with different multipath proiles for each receiver<br />

would be an appropriate output to demonstrate the levels of<br />

compatibility. The matrix could include other processing condi-<br />

tions for the SSBSC transmission as well.<br />

Testing compatibility with RBDS and IBOC DAB are simpler since<br />

the failure of digital reception can be used to determine the po-<br />

tential impact of SSBSC transmission. It is possible that severe<br />

degradation of analog FM stereo occurs before failure of digital<br />

reception. This would simplify the extent of these tests.<br />

BROCHURES<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/BROCHURES<br />

SOFTWARE UPDATES<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/SOFTWARE<br />

Coverage enhancement is a simpler, and optional, consideration.<br />

The improvements could be determined by changes in audio<br />

signal-to-noise ratio with stereo FM receivers equipped with<br />

suitable SSBSC decoders. NPR Labs’ standard approach uses a<br />

frequency-weighted quasi-peak psophometer, compliant with<br />

ITU-R Recommendation 468-1, which correlates well with listen-<br />

er’s assessments of noise-limited reception. A more comprehen-<br />

sive test would include multipath reception conditions, to ensure<br />

that the potential improvements are not degraded by multipath<br />

propagation effects.<br />

The test of effects to reception on irst and second-adjacent<br />

channels is conducted similar to the above: WQPSNR is mea-<br />

sured by psophometer as the ratio of undesired (SSBSC) carrier<br />

to desired carrier is varied. The RF protection ratio at which the<br />

same WQPSNR is achieved with SSBSC, relative to standard DSB-<br />

SC, is noted. The undesired carrier should be modulated by an au-<br />

dio program signal, or simulated program signal, that represents<br />

the RF spectral occupancy of typical FM stations. More than one<br />

program modulation could be considered, such as high-density<br />

music and low-density music. The test matrix would tabulate the<br />

change in RF protection ratios against a variety of receiver types.<br />

Again, a more comprehensive test should introduce multipath<br />

proiles to the matrix to ensure that multipath propagation does<br />

not increase the RF protection ratio” [6].<br />

As of this writing, the author is in the process of assembling a<br />

proposal for the AFAB subgroup of the NRSC that will propose<br />

formalized industry testing of the SSBSC transmission method.<br />

IN CLOSING…<br />

An opportunity presents itself to our industry. The chance to im-<br />

prove the sonic performance of conventional FM-Stereo radio.<br />

Even if a subtle improvement, through reduction of perceived<br />

multipath, offers the possibility of people listening longer to FM<br />

radio, everyone gains. Together, equipment designers, receiver<br />

manufacturers and broadcasters can work together to further<br />

investigate the viability of SSBSC as an optional transmission<br />

method. Thus far, the initial results look very positive, based on<br />

feedback from broadcasters. It is possible that some hurdle ex-<br />

ists, and hopefully through joint, mutual effort of our industry,<br />

we’ll be able to determine what to do, should that be the case.<br />

It must be noted there is an extremely large and positive inter-<br />

est in this topic. Should the reader desire to become involved,<br />

please contact this author, or a member of the AFAB subgroup<br />

of the NRSC.<br />

After 50 years of stellar operation, a modiication to the rules<br />

and regulations governing FM-Stereo, would be a wonderful way<br />

to celebrate this technology! More importantly, the benefactors<br />

are the general public-radio listeners, as audible annoyances will<br />

be suppressed, and in some cases, eliminated. At a time when<br />

broadcasters are looking to ind every possible way to enhance<br />

their customers (the listener’s) experience, this change in the<br />

rules would beneit everyone. This concept offers total upside,<br />

with – as of yet -no downside at all.<br />

For references and acknowledgements see:<br />

omniaaudio.com/downloads/white-papers/MPX-SSB-White-Paper.pdf<br />

FIND A DEALER<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM/BUY<br />

AUDIO PROCESSING | FM | FM+HD | AM | MULTICASTING | CODED AUDIO | STUDIO APPLICATIONS<br />

OMNIAAUDIO.COM<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!