20.08.2013 Views

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

NOW! 12-13 - Telos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OMNIA | FM-STEREO TRANSMISSION | TECHNOLOGY ARTICLE<br />

58<br />

SINGLE SIDEBAND SUPPRESSED CARRIER (SSBSC)<br />

REAL WORLD ACTIVITY: IN THE FIELD, AND IN THE LAB<br />

Transmitting SSBSC modulation of the FM-Stereo signal can be<br />

done right now! Software exists to implement this method to-<br />

day. One minor item must be addressed: FCC rule 73.322, section<br />

(A), subpart (4) which states “Double sideband, suppressed-car-<br />

rier, amplitude modulation of the stereophonic subcarrier at 38<br />

kHz must be used.” Seems there was a time, when rule 73.322(A)<br />

(4) was required. Times have changed. Both transmission and re-<br />

ception irmware have improved signiicantly to enable a change<br />

in the rules and regulations governing FM-Stereo, at least to al-<br />

low the use of SSBSC as an option for the broadcaster.<br />

At present, based on the theory, testing, and indings present-<br />

ed here, the FCC allows Experimental Authority (EA) operation,<br />

which enables broadcasters to implement the SSBSC transmis-<br />

sion method. Beneit occurs immediately to those whom employ<br />

SSBSC, especially those in areas of rough terrain with signii-<br />

cant hills, and mountains. As of this writing, SSBSC is on-the-<br />

air in multiple major markets, and all users report a reduction<br />

in perceived multipath. The general consensus is how a mobile<br />

receiver operates less in the blend function. As the radio comes<br />

out of blend, when SSBSC is used, the appearance of added high<br />

frequency content is perceived. Many radios reduce the high<br />

frequency range, along with blending stereo separation during<br />

instances of multipath. In some cases the change is quite notice-<br />

able, and in others it has been observed to be a small improve-<br />

ment. It should be noted that severe multipath will cause annoy-<br />

ance to either form of transmission: DSBSC and SSBSC.<br />

While most feedback is of the subjective anecdotal variety, there<br />

has been some initial lab testing done to determine, at the very<br />

least, if SSBSC offers any degradation to FM service. Using a mul-<br />

tipath generator, that offered repeatable multipath proiles in a<br />

controlled environment, it was possible to gather data from a re-<br />

ceiver operating under an impaired signal. Testing was done with<br />

DSBSC and repeated for SSBSC. A simple test of transmitting a<br />

1kHz tone in a single channel, and then monitoring the recovered<br />

Left/Right channels in a mobile receiver would indicate any deg-<br />

radation between DSBSC and SSBSC. The test was done over a<br />

twenty-four second period. Figure-21 illustrates the plot of the<br />

transmit 1kHz tone in the Left channel, along with any crosstalk<br />

that spilled over into the Right channel due to hits of multipath.<br />

The multipath instances can be observed as the sections of the<br />

Left channel where the signal degrades. Figure-22 is the result of<br />

the same test done in SSBSC mode.<br />

Figure-21, DSBSC<br />

Figure-22, SSBSC<br />

Notice there is virtually no difference between the two plots.<br />

Had multipath distortion been more severe for either mode,<br />

the amount of crosstalk into the Right channel would have in-<br />

creased. This test therefore indicates that SSBSC offers no per-<br />

ceivable degradation to the FM service signal.<br />

TAKING IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL…<br />

In addition to those broadcasters whom are using SSBSC under<br />

an EA from the FCC, there is continued testing being done in the<br />

lab. The topic is also an active action item within the AM FM Au-<br />

dio Broadcast (AFAB) sub-group of the National Radio Systems<br />

Committee (NRSC). As with any consideration to possibly change<br />

the rules, testing, data gathering, and system evaluation must<br />

be done. Additionally, viability must be shown to indicate public<br />

beneit.<br />

To this extent, criteria has been brought forward to propose<br />

tests which would help answer questions regarding the feasibil-<br />

ity of SSBSC as an optional transmission method to the present<br />

means. What follows is the body from a paper offered by John<br />

Kean, of NPR Labs.<br />

“Conversion to a single-sideband suppressed carrier stereo sub-<br />

channel for FM broadcasting represents a technical change in<br />

terms of FCC rules that is suficient to require thorough docu-<br />

mentation in the public record. Indeed, comments iled recently<br />

with the NRSC suggest that while a SSBSC system may offer<br />

beneits, such as reduced noise and interference to IBOC digital<br />

sidebands, the system also may increase FM audio distortion un-<br />

der multipath reception conditions [2][3]. These potential issues<br />

should be evaluated objectively and made available to the radio<br />

industry through the NRSC. This paper discusses a suggested ap-<br />

proach for tests that can determine the compatibility of SSBSC,<br />

as well as potential improvements offered by SSBSC.<br />

Evaluation of a new transmission standard may be considered in<br />

three main areas:<br />

» Receiving compatibility with the host station’s signal<br />

» Potential for reception enhancements<br />

» Effect on stations on adjacent frequencies<br />

(allocation compatibility)<br />

The irst area, compatibility with the host, may be considered for<br />

the following:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!