20.08.2013 Views

ICDD PDF-4+ 2012 Instructions

ICDD PDF-4+ 2012 Instructions

ICDD PDF-4+ 2012 Instructions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CuOx–TiO2–Nb2O5 pseudoternary phase diagram”, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2011 for<br />

further details of this study).<br />

The rutile peaks are also present in the other two histograms, for x = 0.242 and 0.286;<br />

however, they are no longer shifting with composition. In addition, we also see extra<br />

reflections – most notably at around 24 and 30 º2θ. In combination, these data show that<br />

the limit for solid solution formation (in samples prepared at 935 ºC as these were, at least)<br />

lies between x = 0.20 and x = 0.242; in this example, I will work on the data for x = 0.286, to<br />

make the presence of the secondary phases obvious.<br />

The indexing of these Bragg reflections from secondary phases was initially informed by the<br />

pseudoternary phase diagram, on which I was working. Previously reported phases with<br />

compositions closest to those of my two rogue samples were obvious candidates to check<br />

first – there were a number of copper niobate and titanium niobate phases listed in the<br />

Powder Diffraction File.<br />

Loading my data file in to SIeve+, I based my initial search filter on what I suspected from<br />

where the composition lay in the pseudoternary phase diagram; I was expecting to see<br />

phases that definitely contained Cu, Nb and O, and might also contain Ti. This returned 24<br />

cards. The software immediately identified a monoclinic CuNb2O6 phase, which gave a good<br />

match for many of my observed reflections. After accepting this card (04-­‐014-­‐9621), the<br />

software pulled up a second, orthorhombic polymorph of CuNb2O6 – this was anticipated,<br />

from literature reviews, as these two phases always co-­‐exist. I accepted this card by again<br />

clicking the handshake button.<br />

No further results were returned. However, there were still additional unindexed<br />

reflections in my data. From my other studies, I knew from the pattern that this was my<br />

doped rutile phase – only one such phase was listed in the database, ‘Cu0.5Ti0.5NbO4’ (x =<br />

0.20) in <strong>PDF</strong> card number 00-­‐046-­‐0524. In the SIeve+ window, I went into the ‘Matches’<br />

menu, and chose ‘Add <strong>PDF</strong> #...’, and entered this card manually. The peaks appeared, and<br />

are a little way off mine – this is to be expected, since the rutile phase in my specimen has a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!