Energy RTD Information Systems in the ERA - European ...
Energy RTD Information Systems in the ERA - European ...
Energy RTD Information Systems in the ERA - European ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 5 – Relative importance for aspects of <strong>in</strong>formation content<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>RTD</strong> <strong>Information</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ERA</strong><br />
A number of <strong>in</strong>formation systems have <strong>in</strong>stalled mechanisms to provide <strong>in</strong>formation of guaranteed<br />
high quality:<br />
• Reputable Austrian research <strong>in</strong>stitutes assure <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> energy technology<br />
sites of <strong>Energy</strong>tech.at<br />
• The scientifi c search eng<strong>in</strong>e Scirus claims high quality from <strong>the</strong> fact that it draws predom<strong>in</strong>antly<br />
on scientifi c sources and peer-reviewed scientifi c journals<br />
• In o<strong>the</strong>r cases all government-funded <strong>RTD</strong> is peer-reviewed (e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK)<br />
• IEA ETDEWEB and US DOE TIM claim high quality through <strong>the</strong> str<strong>in</strong>gent <strong>in</strong>formation quality<br />
procedures that are applied.<br />
However, <strong>in</strong> most energy <strong>RTD</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation systems (as listed <strong>in</strong> Annexes B and C) <strong>the</strong> quality<br />
system is only implicit. The user is kept <strong>in</strong> doubt about <strong>the</strong> actual status and quality of <strong>the</strong><br />
reports and abstracts presented. These systems do not make any reference to <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
upload and quality procedures. A general observation is that many fund<strong>in</strong>g programme-related<br />
systems primarily conta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation extracted from <strong>the</strong> project descriptions submitted. These<br />
texts describe “what <strong>the</strong> <strong>RTD</strong> will (ideally) achieve” <strong>in</strong>stead of “what <strong>the</strong> <strong>RTD</strong> has achieved”. As<br />
project descriptions are written to acquire fund<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>y often lack scientifi c and technical details<br />
and also objectivity (sketch<strong>in</strong>g too positive panoramas).<br />
Large differences also exist on update frequency of <strong>the</strong> energy <strong>RTD</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation systems. The<br />
difference is between susta<strong>in</strong>ed and professionally managed <strong>in</strong>itiatives and occasional <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />
Professionally managed systems have well-defi ned procedures about <strong>the</strong> update frequency.<br />
<strong>Systems</strong> driven by accountability of fund<strong>in</strong>g typically update once a year, when <strong>the</strong> new fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
projects are known. It is remarkable is that some systems, developed with EU fund<strong>in</strong>g, are<br />
no longer updated but still available on <strong>the</strong> web. Examples are EU Atlas, EU Agores and EU<br />
Euronex.<br />
There are large differences <strong>in</strong> coverage of energy <strong>RTD</strong>. IEA ETDEWEB provides <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
database: it gives access to 3.4 million bibliographic records on energy <strong>RTD</strong> provided by <strong>the</strong> 16<br />
participat<strong>in</strong>g IEA member countries. The table below gives <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> coverage of energy <strong>RTD</strong><br />
of systems for which data are available.<br />
27