04.10.2013 Views

Mechanisms for the Deterioration in Glucose Tolerance ... - Diabetes

Mechanisms for the Deterioration in Glucose Tolerance ... - Diabetes

Mechanisms for the Deterioration in Glucose Tolerance ... - Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROTEASE INHIBITOR–INDUCED GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE<br />

TABLE 7<br />

Basel<strong>in</strong>e systemic glucose and FFA turnover and clearance<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e 12 weeks<br />

P vs.<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>Glucose</strong> turnover (mol kg 1 m<strong>in</strong> 1 )<br />

NRTI pretreated 9.6 0.8 8.4 0.7<br />

NRTI naïve 11.8 0.4 9.2 1.0<br />

Both 10.3 0.5 8.7 0.6 0.002<br />

Normal volunteers 11.3 0.5<br />

P vs. groups<br />

<strong>Glucose</strong> turnover plasma <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong><br />

(mol kg<br />

0.08<br />

1 m<strong>in</strong> 1 pmol/l 1 )<br />

NRTI pretreated 1042 201 1073 175<br />

NRTI naïve 706 131 792 101<br />

Both 913 138 965 117 0.55<br />

Normal volunteers 826 143<br />

P vs. groups<br />

<strong>Glucose</strong> clearance (ml kg<br />

0.34<br />

1 m<strong>in</strong> 1 )<br />

NRTI pretreated 2.10 0.17 1.58 0.14<br />

NRTI naïve 2.44 0.13 1.61 0.16<br />

Both 2.21 0.13 1.59 0.10 0.001<br />

Normal volunteers 2.31 0.11<br />

P vs. groups<br />

FFA turnover<br />

0.93<br />

NRTI pretreated 2.68 0.25 4.80 0.42<br />

NRTI naïve 3.12 0.31 5.89 0.90<br />

Both 2.85 0.20 5.22 0.44 0.001<br />

Normal volunteers 3.54 0.3<br />

P vs. groups<br />

FFA clearance (ml kg<br />

0.15<br />

1 m<strong>in</strong> 1 )<br />

NRTI pretreated 4.79 0.66 8.16 0.79<br />

NRTI naïve 7.26 1.02 9.20 0.86<br />

Both 5.74 0.64 8.56 0.58 0.001<br />

Normal volunteers 7.90 0.94<br />

P vs. groups 0.06<br />

Data are means SD.<br />

consistent with <strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> clearance had<br />

been reduced. If C-peptide clearance been altered, one<br />

would expect to f<strong>in</strong>d a change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plasma pro<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>–<br />

to–plasma C-peptide ratio. The practical significance of<br />

this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is that changes <strong>in</strong> plasma <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> concentrations<br />

cannot be used as an <strong>in</strong>dex of -cell function dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatment with protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor–conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g regimens.<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> present study <strong>in</strong>dicates that protease<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibitor–conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g regimens impair glucose tolerance <strong>in</strong><br />

HIV-<strong>in</strong>fected patients by two mechanisms: 1) <strong>in</strong>ducement<br />

of peripheral <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> resistance <strong>in</strong> skeletal muscle and<br />

adipose tissue and 2) reduction <strong>in</strong> pancreatic -cell function.<br />

There are several cl<strong>in</strong>ical implications of this study.<br />

First, use of <strong>the</strong>se regimens may cause deterioration of<br />

glycemic control <strong>in</strong> patients with preexist<strong>in</strong>g diabetes.<br />

Second, because <strong>the</strong>se regimens appear to <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong><br />

resistance predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> skeletal muscle and adipose<br />

tissue, antidiabetic agents that exert <strong>the</strong>ir major action on<br />

peripheral tissues ra<strong>the</strong>r than on <strong>the</strong> liver (e.g., thiazolid<strong>in</strong>ediones)<br />

would appear advantageous (48). Third, because<br />

first-phase <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> release appears to be more severely<br />

impaired than second-phase <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> release, secretagogues<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> meglit<strong>in</strong>ides, which primarily improve firstphase<br />

<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> release (49), may be preferable to sulfonylureas,<br />

which apparently only affect second-phase <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong><br />

release (49).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This work was supported <strong>in</strong> part by Division of Research<br />

Resources GCRC Grant 5MO1 RR 00044, <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Institute of <strong>Diabetes</strong> and Digestive and Kidney Diseases<br />

Grant DK-20411 (to J.E.G.), and NIAID grant AI 27658 (to<br />

R.C.R.).<br />

We thank Mary Little <strong>for</strong> her excellent editorial assistance<br />

and <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g and laboratory staff of <strong>the</strong> General<br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Research Center <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir superb help.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Flexner C: HIV-protease <strong>in</strong>hibitors. N Engl J Med 338:1281–1292, 1998<br />

2. Hruz P, Murata H, Mueckler M: Adverse metabolic consequences of HIV<br />

protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor <strong>the</strong>rapy: <strong>the</strong> search <strong>for</strong> a central mechanism. Am J<br />

Physiol Endocr<strong>in</strong>ol Metab 280:E549–E553, 2001<br />

3. Lee E, Walmsley S, Fantus I: New-onset diabetes mellitus associated with<br />

protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>in</strong> an HIV-positive patient: case report and<br />

review. CMAJ 161:161–164, 1999<br />

4. Visnegarwala F, Krause K, Musher D: Severe diabetes associated with<br />

protease <strong>in</strong>hibitor <strong>the</strong>rapy. Ann Intern Med 127:947, 1997<br />

5. Behrens G, Dejam A, Schmidt H, Balks H, Brabant G, Korner T, Stoll M,<br />

Schmidt R: Impaired glucose tolerance, beta cell function and lipid<br />

metabolism <strong>in</strong> HIV patients under treatment with protease <strong>in</strong>hibitors. AIDS<br />

13:F63–F70, 1999<br />

6. Tsiodras S, Mantzoros C, Hammer S, Samore M: Effects of protease<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibitors on hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and lipodystrophy: a 5-year<br />

cohort study. Arch Intern Med 160:2050–2056, 2000<br />

7. Ja<strong>in</strong> R, Furf<strong>in</strong>e E, Pedneault L, White A, Lenhard J: Metabolic complica-<br />

924 DIABETES, VOL. 52, APRIL 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!