15.10.2013 Views

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

address environmental issues (ie the reduction of harmful emissions from the use of the<br />

fuel) except indirectly. The Australian <strong>Standards</strong> address a number of fuel properties not<br />

generally considered significant in terms of emissions management, while omitting others<br />

known to be significant in this respect. In addition, these standards do not deal adequately<br />

with fuel specifications required for the deployment of advanced engine and vehicle<br />

technologies that would facilitate the delivery of reduced fuel consumption by vehicles.<br />

4.1.1 Advantages and disadvantages<br />

The current system does not provide for national consistency in terms of fuel<br />

composition. The actual properties of petrol and diesel fuel produced by each Australian<br />

refinery differ between refineries and, to a variable extent, from the specifications in the<br />

Australian <strong>Standards</strong> (Appendix 1). Little information is available on the quality of<br />

imported fuel.<br />

In 1998, Environment Australia commissioned Coffey Geosciences Pty Ltd to undertake<br />

a Review of <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Requirements for Australian Transport to inform the process<br />

for developing fuel quality standards. The Review modelled the air quality outcomes (in<br />

terms of emissions reductions) from a range of scenarios, including a Business as Usual<br />

(BaU) option. It found that there would be substantial improvements in air quality over<br />

time from harmonisation with European fuel standards. For some pollutants, reductions<br />

of up to 60% in emissions are predicted over the BaU option for the period 2000 to 2020.<br />

Modelling results showed clear differences in emissions reductions over time from the<br />

vehicle fleet between BaU (Scenario 1) and increasing compliance with Euro fuel quality<br />

standards (Scenarios 2-6).<br />

For example, under the BaU scenario, emissions of fine particulate matter are estimated<br />

to decrease by 10% as the current ADRs take effect, and then to increase again from 2010<br />

as diesel vehicle use grows. In relation to oxides of nitrogen, the projected improvement<br />

in emissions under BaU is estimated as a 17% reduction between 2000 and 2010 as the<br />

ADRs take effect, while compliance with Euro standards gives estimated reductions of<br />

approximately 34% for the same period.<br />

The investment necessary on the part of the existing Australian refineries to meet tighter<br />

fuel specifications varies considerably, but is in all cases significant. The majority of the<br />

refineries, whose profit margins are already reduced due to the state of the global market,<br />

are unlikely to voluntarily undertake the investment necessary to produce low sulfur fuels<br />

within the timeframe set by the new vehicle emission standards ADRs.<br />

The announcement by the Commonwealth Government of the Measures for a Better<br />

Environmentinitiative, which foreshadowed changes to the sulfur content of petrol and<br />

diesel, has led to a number of States introducing or proposing to introduce State-specific<br />

fuel quality legislation. This has already taken place in Western Australia and<br />

Queensland. As noted earlier this appears likely to result in different standards in<br />

different jurisdictions. There are associated competition problems with this approach -<br />

raising effective barriers for refiners and importers to interstate markets and raising<br />

compliance costs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!