National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...
National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...
National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
address environmental issues (ie the reduction of harmful emissions from the use of the<br />
fuel) except indirectly. The Australian <strong>Standards</strong> address a number of fuel properties not<br />
generally considered significant in terms of emissions management, while omitting others<br />
known to be significant in this respect. In addition, these standards do not deal adequately<br />
with fuel specifications required for the deployment of advanced engine and vehicle<br />
technologies that would facilitate the delivery of reduced fuel consumption by vehicles.<br />
4.1.1 Advantages and disadvantages<br />
The current system does not provide for national consistency in terms of fuel<br />
composition. The actual properties of petrol and diesel fuel produced by each Australian<br />
refinery differ between refineries and, to a variable extent, from the specifications in the<br />
Australian <strong>Standards</strong> (Appendix 1). Little information is available on the quality of<br />
imported fuel.<br />
In 1998, Environment Australia commissioned Coffey Geosciences Pty Ltd to undertake<br />
a Review of <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Requirements for Australian Transport to inform the process<br />
for developing fuel quality standards. The Review modelled the air quality outcomes (in<br />
terms of emissions reductions) from a range of scenarios, including a Business as Usual<br />
(BaU) option. It found that there would be substantial improvements in air quality over<br />
time from harmonisation with European fuel standards. For some pollutants, reductions<br />
of up to 60% in emissions are predicted over the BaU option for the period 2000 to 2020.<br />
Modelling results showed clear differences in emissions reductions over time from the<br />
vehicle fleet between BaU (Scenario 1) and increasing compliance with Euro fuel quality<br />
standards (Scenarios 2-6).<br />
For example, under the BaU scenario, emissions of fine particulate matter are estimated<br />
to decrease by 10% as the current ADRs take effect, and then to increase again from 2010<br />
as diesel vehicle use grows. In relation to oxides of nitrogen, the projected improvement<br />
in emissions under BaU is estimated as a 17% reduction between 2000 and 2010 as the<br />
ADRs take effect, while compliance with Euro standards gives estimated reductions of<br />
approximately 34% for the same period.<br />
The investment necessary on the part of the existing Australian refineries to meet tighter<br />
fuel specifications varies considerably, but is in all cases significant. The majority of the<br />
refineries, whose profit margins are already reduced due to the state of the global market,<br />
are unlikely to voluntarily undertake the investment necessary to produce low sulfur fuels<br />
within the timeframe set by the new vehicle emission standards ADRs.<br />
The announcement by the Commonwealth Government of the Measures for a Better<br />
Environmentinitiative, which foreshadowed changes to the sulfur content of petrol and<br />
diesel, has led to a number of States introducing or proposing to introduce State-specific<br />
fuel quality legislation. This has already taken place in Western Australia and<br />
Queensland. As noted earlier this appears likely to result in different standards in<br />
different jurisdictions. There are associated competition problems with this approach -<br />
raising effective barriers for refiners and importers to interstate markets and raising<br />
compliance costs.