15.10.2013 Views

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

* The possibility of supplying dual grade ‘city/country’ diesel, with low sulphur diesel<br />

supplied in the major city areas and higher sulphur diesel supplied in the country areas<br />

for an interim period; and<br />

* Incentives for the promotion of green fuels suitable for use in transport and switching<br />

of vehicles to such fuels.<br />

Commonwealth’s proposal for national fuel quality standards<br />

As part of the consultation process for developing national fuel quality standards, the<br />

Commonwealth held face to face meetings with stakeholders in the jurisdictions during<br />

May and June 2000. The main objective of these meetings was to provide an opportunity<br />

for stakeholders to discuss the proposals presented in the discussion papers and any<br />

issues of concern relating to the proposed standards or the process for implementing<br />

them.<br />

The Commonwealth team consisted of representatives from Environment Australia,<br />

Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of Industry, Science and Resources, and the<br />

Department of Transport and Regional Services. An Interdepartmental Committee<br />

representing other relevant Commonwealth Government departments was also consulted<br />

during development of the Commonwealth legislation and proposed fuel quality<br />

standards.<br />

The main issues arising from this consultation process include:<br />

* The proposal that Commonwealth legislation will override any inconsistent State<br />

regulations. Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia have introduced or will<br />

be introducing State-specific legislation where some standards, e.g. for benzene, are more<br />

stringent than the standard proposed by the Commonwealth. They have indicated quite<br />

strongly that they do not want to see Commonwealth standards result in a worse<br />

environmental outcome in their jurisdictions.<br />

* Concern has also been expressed that the timing for the introduction of fuel standards<br />

will close some refineries which would also have implications for dependent industries,<br />

e.g. the petrochemical industry.<br />

* The timing of the introduction of fuel standards to facilitate the new emissions control<br />

ADRs. The Commonwealth proposes introducing standards for technology enabling<br />

parameters 12 months in advance of the mandated date for the new ADRs. as specified<br />

under Measures for a Better Environment. The automotive industry has indicated that<br />

Euro 3 vehicles will be introduced during the 12 months leading up to the mandated date.<br />

It will, therefore, be necessary to ensure that appropriate fuel is available during this lead<br />

up time. On the other hand, the refining industry have concerns that this cuts into time<br />

available for the investment needed to upgrade plant and in gaining the necessary<br />

approvals from their companies.<br />

* In relation to timing, the refining industry has also indicated that once new diesel plant<br />

is established to produce 50 ppm sulfur, the old plant will then be converted for 50 ppm<br />

sulfur petrol. Therefore, the Commonwealth’s proposal for the introduction of 50 ppm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!