15.10.2013 Views

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

National Fuel Quality Standards Regulation Impact Statement 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5.1 Advantages and Disadvantages<br />

The uptake of LPG and CNG is largely limited to urban areas, particular engine types and<br />

vehicle fleets. As outlined above, there are a number of major logistical barriers to the<br />

wider adoption of alternative fuels, and as such, alternative fuels are not considered a<br />

viable options (at this stage) to achieve the objectives in the required timeframe.<br />

The Commonwealth Government currently exempts both LPG and CNG from fuel excise<br />

as a means of encouraging their development as alternative fuels. The Government is not<br />

able to mandate the use of specific fuels, as it would be contrary to competition<br />

principles. As indicated above, the alternative fuels network has a limited capacity to<br />

supply the fleet, and thus the use of alternative fuels, in itself, is not sufficient to deliver<br />

significant reductions in total emissions from the road vehicle fleet.<br />

Summary<br />

The increased use of alternative fuels has the potential to reduce emission from motor<br />

vehicles. The Government has in place a number of policy options to encourage the use<br />

of alternative fuels, such as the CNG Infrastructure Program, the Alternative <strong>Fuel</strong>s<br />

Conversion Program, the Diesel and the Alternative <strong>Fuel</strong> Grants Scheme (which<br />

maintains the relative price of LPG and CNG compared to diesel), and the favourable<br />

excise treatment of LPG and CNG.<br />

However, the current capacity for switching to alternative fuels is limited, and their<br />

consideration as an option to achieve a national approach for fuel quality standards is not<br />

practicable at this stage. Should a significant transition to alternative fuels be achieved in<br />

the future (as the Commonwealth’s alternative fuels program seeks to achieve), then<br />

alternative fuels use will have a greater impact on improved environmental outcomes.<br />

Alternative fuels will probably have a neutral or positive impact on competition and<br />

trade. However, the relatively limited current penetration of alternative fuels in the<br />

Australian market means that at present they have limited value in addressing<br />

environmental concerns.<br />

While the proposed national fuel quality standards focus on petrol and diesel, it is<br />

envisaged that standards for alternative fuels would be considered for inclusion at a<br />

future date under the proposed framework legislation.<br />

4.6 LIMITING VEHICLE TRAVEL (Option 6)<br />

In order to address transport sourced urban air pollution and greenhouse emissions, there<br />

is ultimately a need to deal with the underlying issue of increasing vehicle travel,<br />

particularly as the emission and fuel consumption reductions achievable from<br />

technological improvements to vehicles and fuels become progressively smaller.<br />

Mechanisms to limit vehicle use include fiscal policies (to reflect true costs of transport),<br />

transport planning, traffic management (Auto-Oil, 1995) and travel demand management.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!