Phoenix Journal 208 - Four Winds 10
Phoenix Journal 208 - Four Winds 10
Phoenix Journal 208 - Four Winds 10
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER <strong>10</strong><br />
WAS JULY 4 MARS LANDING<br />
FAKE OR FACADE?<br />
SERIOUS QUESTIONS BEHIND SLICK SHOW<br />
by Ray Bilger 7/9/97<br />
In the few weeks just prior to July 4th, 1997, Americans were slowly fed more and more bits of information<br />
from N.A.S.A. regarding the scheduled landing on the surface of the planet Mars of a United States<br />
spacecraft. N.A.S.A.’s own Internet Website reports: “On July 4, 1997, N.A.S.A.’s Mars Pathfinder<br />
landed on Mars and the next day the Sojourner rover rolled off the lander to conduct the first mobile<br />
geological soil studies of Mars.” But are we to believe what we are being shown and fed on our television<br />
screens, especially with all the “special effects” technical resources available these days from the simulated-image<br />
masters in Hollywood and elsewhere?<br />
Suddenly, on July 4th, with all the hype and fanfare one would expect for a premier screening of a new<br />
Hollywood movie, America was deluged with a spectacularly FLAWLESS display of the latest success<br />
story in America’s so-called “space” program. The day before, July 3rd, we had few, if any, clues as to<br />
what we would soon be seeing. It was immediately obvious, however, on the 4th, that a great deal of<br />
rehearsing, writing of stories, creation of TV logos and special headlines, and overall planning had been<br />
coordinated and carried out to present to the public a major media event they would not soon forget. But<br />
was this just a slick cover story for something else that N.A.S.A. was REALLY undertaking on Mars?<br />
Listeners to Art Bell’s late-night talk-radio program might be familiar with a now-regular guest to his<br />
show, Richard Hoagland. Richard’s credentials would appear to make him more qualified to be telling us<br />
about Mars than the mostly rather young-looking persons we are now listening to from N.A.S.A. A partial<br />
list of his impressive scientific accomplishments includes: recipient of the Angstrom Medal for Excellence in<br />
Science, 1993; former Science Advisor to Walter Cronkite and CBS News; science contributor to magazines<br />
such as OMNI, ANALOG and SCIENCE DIGEST; consultant to N.A.S.A.’s Goddard Space<br />
Flight Center from 1975 to 1980; organizer of the Independent Mars Investigation (1984) and the Mars<br />
Investigation Group (1986) and The Mars Mission (1988); Author of The Monuments Of Mars: A City<br />
On The Edge Of Forever; former Curator of Astronomy and Space Science at the Springfield Museum<br />
of Science in Massachusetts; etc., etc.<br />
So, why doesn’t N.A.S.A. have Mr. Hoagland report on Mars? For one reason, they cannot control him!<br />
He calls it as he sees it. So we get N.A.S.A. preppies. Richard has, for some time now, been pointing out<br />
and exposing major inconsistencies in what N.A.S.A. says it is doing as opposed to what appears to really<br />
be going on in outer space. Many listeners to Art Bell’s program no doubt eagerly awaited the <strong>10</strong> o’clock<br />
p.m. starting hour on the 4th to hear what might be said.<br />
As the show got underway, Art was predictably excited about what he had been watching on TV earlier<br />
that day, which displayed N.A.S.A.’s great apparent achievement. Of course, he had as his guest Richard<br />
Hoagland, who was about to take some of the wind out of Art’s sails.<br />
60