Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya
Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya
Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2 • MARKETS AND POVERTY IN NORTHERN KENYA: TOWARDS A FINANCIAL GRADUATION MODEL<br />
1.3 OVERVIEW OF GRADUATION PROjECTS<br />
Graduation projects most relevant to <strong>FSD</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> are briefly<br />
described here. Their respective graduation models are presented <strong>in</strong> Annex 2.<br />
1.3.1 PSNP Plus <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia<br />
The Productive Safety Net Program Plus <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia was designed to build<br />
on the Government of Ethiopia’s cash <strong>and</strong> asset transfer programme. This<br />
targeted people who were extremely food <strong>in</strong>secure with a series of additional<br />
<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sav<strong>in</strong>gs group formation, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> promis<strong>in</strong>g value<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ks to micro-f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>stitutions (MFIs) (Fowler <strong>and</strong> Endalamaw,<br />
2011). Rather than provid<strong>in</strong>g a direct asset transfer, the project worked with<br />
local MFIs to design products suited to the economic activities with<strong>in</strong> their<br />
targeted value cha<strong>in</strong>s. With loan funds provided by the project, the MFIs<br />
then offered loans to the project’s target clients, repayable by the client with<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> accordance with the cash flow of the <strong>in</strong>vestment. These loans were<br />
made available to <strong>in</strong>dividuals who had already built up sufficient liquid capital<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a sav<strong>in</strong>gs group. The types <strong>and</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>terventions implemented<br />
by PSNP Plus are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1:<br />
PSNP Plus Interventions Tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Cash / food transfers<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Group formation <strong>and</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Income Generat<strong>in</strong>g Activity tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Producer Market<strong>in</strong>g Group formation <strong>and</strong> development<br />
First micro-leas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Productive VC tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess skills tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial literacy tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Subsequent micro-leas<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Source: Fowler <strong>and</strong> Endalamaw, 2011: 4<br />
Table 1: PSNP Plus <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />
Implemented as a pilot by a consortium of organisations led by CARE, with<br />
fund<strong>in</strong>g from USAID, the project ran from 2009 to 2011. Significantly for <strong>FSD</strong>,<br />
a case study of the PSNP Plus project found that the sav<strong>in</strong>gs groups played<br />
a critical role <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g economic advancement of the PSNP recipients.<br />
They did so by lower<strong>in</strong>g risk, mobilis<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial capital for <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>and</strong><br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g a cost-effective platform to receive other project services (Fowler <strong>and</strong><br />
Endamalaw, 2011). The project targeted food <strong>in</strong>secure areas <strong>in</strong> four prov<strong>in</strong>ces.<br />
However, most of the project areas faced a serious drought <strong>in</strong> the first year,<br />
which meant that progress <strong>in</strong> the value cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions was significantly<br />
set back <strong>and</strong> many households needed several years just to rega<strong>in</strong> the assets<br />
they had at project <strong>in</strong>ception. This limited the total number of households<br />
graduat<strong>in</strong>g over the period to 2,800 out of a targeted 47,414 households.<br />
Importantly, the project regarded graduation as def<strong>in</strong>ed by ceas<strong>in</strong>g reliance<br />
on the PSNP transfer. However, the Government of Ethiopia was responsible<br />
for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g graduation, <strong>and</strong> political <strong>in</strong>centives sometimes favoured<br />
graduat<strong>in</strong>g households to demonstrate the project’s success, regardless of their<br />
actual status. The project’s budget was $15 million <strong>and</strong> aimed to reach 47,414<br />
households, imply<strong>in</strong>g an annual cost per household of $105. Significantly,<br />
participat<strong>in</strong>g households favoured livestock value cha<strong>in</strong>s (particularly small<br />
rum<strong>in</strong>ants) over crop-based value cha<strong>in</strong>s, which they felt were too risky <strong>in</strong> an<br />
arid environment characterised by unreliable ra<strong>in</strong>fall.