26.10.2013 Views

Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya

Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya

Markets and poverty in northern Kenya: Towards a ... - FSD Kenya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 • MARKETS AND POVERTY IN NORTHERN KENYA: TOWARDS A FINANCIAL GRADUATION MODEL<br />

Value Cha<strong>in</strong> Market opportunities Constra<strong>in</strong>ts Pro-poor potential Overall assessment<br />

Hides <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>s Grow<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness<br />

of <strong>Kenya</strong>n processors, but<br />

unclear opportunities for<br />

<strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong>n producers.<br />

Opportunities <strong>and</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts: limited <strong>in</strong>formation on the market<br />

prospects for hides <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> makes it difficult to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the<br />

potential additional benefits that could accrue to <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong>n pastoralists.<br />

While <strong>Kenya</strong>n process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries that relied upon sk<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> hides suffered<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g the withdrawal of protection after liberalisation (CARE International<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong>, 2010: 14) exports of semi-processed <strong>and</strong> processed products (e.g.<br />

leather, shoes) are now on the ascendency. This suggests the <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly competitive <strong>and</strong> may ultimately mean grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for sk<strong>in</strong> producers. However, the distribution of the benefits from this<br />

trend is not clear, nor is the ability of producers <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> to benefit<br />

versus other hides producers. A significant constra<strong>in</strong>t for producers <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong><br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> is the very poor quality of their sk<strong>in</strong>s. There are several causes. The<br />

environment poses challenges: the many thorns <strong>in</strong> the ASALs graz<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>and</strong>s<br />

cause significant damage to the sk<strong>in</strong>s. Poor br<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> flay<strong>in</strong>g practices<br />

exacerbate the damage to the sk<strong>in</strong>. Dry<strong>in</strong>g practices also lower quality: while<br />

wet dried sk<strong>in</strong>s are strongly preferred by buyers <strong>and</strong> garner higher prices, most<br />

producers sun-dry their sk<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> sell them for approximately half of the wet<br />

dried price (Kagunyu et al, 2010: 814). Most pastoralists are not aware of<br />

the grad<strong>in</strong>g system that rewards proper sk<strong>in</strong> management. Other quality<br />

deficiencies <strong>in</strong>clude small sized hides - given the poor health of many animals<br />

- <strong>and</strong> the many defects <strong>in</strong> the hides (CARE International <strong>Kenya</strong>, 2010: 14).<br />

Potential areas of <strong>in</strong>tervention: additional research is required <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

potential benefits of the hides <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>s value cha<strong>in</strong>s for people <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong><br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> to assess whether the <strong>in</strong>vestments required <strong>in</strong> upgrad<strong>in</strong>g the quality of<br />

sk<strong>in</strong>s would derive adequate benefits for producers, as significant <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

is required for hides <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>s from the region to compete effectively.<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g knowledge on hide management <strong>and</strong> dry<strong>in</strong>g practices (e.g. cur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices such as wet salt cur<strong>in</strong>g, effective flay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sk<strong>in</strong> diseases) is clearly important. Just 12 to 30 per cent of pastoralists <strong>in</strong><br />

Marsabit, for <strong>in</strong>stance, are aware of wet salt cur<strong>in</strong>g despite the relative ease<br />

with which it can be adopted. Improv<strong>in</strong>g the availability <strong>and</strong> quality of animal<br />

health services would help to address some of the most common problems,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g parasites <strong>and</strong> diseases (Kagunyu et al, 2010: 815). Improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

producers’ market knowledge would also help to <strong>in</strong>crease the <strong>in</strong>centives for<br />

sk<strong>in</strong> management. Advocat<strong>in</strong>g to the government to lower cess taxes would<br />

improve the competitive position of producers <strong>in</strong> the north. However, the<br />

ability to address some constra<strong>in</strong>ts (e.g. poor animal nutrition <strong>and</strong> health)<br />

may be very difficult <strong>and</strong> the return on those <strong>in</strong>vestments needs to be more<br />

effectively assessed.<br />

Fodder value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Background: the vast majority of livestock <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> graze on<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>-fed pasture. However, around well-watered <strong>and</strong> urban areas such as <strong>in</strong><br />

M<strong>and</strong>era on the border with Somalia <strong>and</strong> Ethiopia, fodder is produced <strong>and</strong><br />

sold. (Nyangaga, 2009: 6). In that area, approximately 2,000 agro-pastoralists<br />

sell fodder to as many as 30,000 urban <strong>and</strong> peri-urban livestock holders<br />

(ibid.).<br />

Opportunities <strong>and</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts: the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g variability of ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

is caus<strong>in</strong>g some pastoralists to settle closer to irrigated fodder producers to<br />

better manage risk (ibid: 7). This is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the dem<strong>and</strong> for fodder where it<br />

is produced <strong>and</strong> encourag<strong>in</strong>g other farmers to <strong>in</strong>crease their own production of<br />

fodder. Though there are areas that can support production, the availability of<br />

water is a critical limitation to the expansion <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability of this activity<br />

across most of <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong>. In the M<strong>and</strong>era area, farmers compla<strong>in</strong> that<br />

rivers are becom<strong>in</strong>g shallower, threaten<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued fodder production.<br />

The opportunity for expansion of the fodder value cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> is<br />

therefore limited to areas with adequate water availability.<br />

Potential areas of <strong>in</strong>tervention : identify areas of <strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> with<br />

the potential to produce fodder. L<strong>in</strong>k farmers to needed services (e.g. technical<br />

knowledge, <strong>in</strong>puts, f<strong>in</strong>ance) that support production.<br />

Value Cha<strong>in</strong> Market opportunities Constra<strong>in</strong>ts Pro-poor potential Overall assessment<br />

Fodder Grow<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>in</strong> the north<br />

due to urbanisation.<br />

Table 9: Hides <strong>and</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>s value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Low quality of sk<strong>in</strong>s from<br />

<strong>northern</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong>.<br />

Improper dry<strong>in</strong>g techniques.<br />

Table 10: Fodder value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Employment <strong>in</strong> primary<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Service provision to the<br />

livestock <strong>in</strong>dustry (e.g.<br />

paravets).<br />

Limited water Casual labour on farms.<br />

Sale of fodder.<br />

Unclear.<br />

Low / Medium

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!