The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
The Sikh Turban: Post-911 Challenges to This Article of Faith
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
D. Denial <strong>of</strong> Entry in<strong>to</strong> Public Places<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> the violent backlash against <strong>Sikh</strong>s, the targeting <strong>of</strong> the turban after<br />
9/11 has also led <strong>to</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong>s being denied entry in<strong>to</strong> various public buildings and places <strong>of</strong><br />
public accommodation, such as courthouses, 142 postsecondary institutions, 143 and<br />
political events. 144 For example, on September 23, 2001, Kabeer Singh was <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>to</strong><br />
remove his turban or leave the Hard Times Café and Santa Fe Cue Club in Springfield,<br />
Virginia—despite the fact that prior <strong>to</strong> September 11, 2001, <strong>Sikh</strong> patrons, including<br />
Singh, had been permitted <strong>to</strong> wear turbans at this establishment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> DOJ conducted an investigation and concluded that F & K Management, Inc.<br />
[hereinafter F & K], the owner and opera<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the establishment, “had engaged in a<br />
pattern or practice <strong>of</strong> discriminating against <strong>Sikh</strong>s, Muslims, Indian-Americans and other<br />
Asian Americans who wear certain kinds <strong>of</strong> head coverings, such as turbans, for religious<br />
or ethnic cultural reasons.” 145 <strong>The</strong> DOJ found F & K in violation <strong>of</strong> Title II <strong>of</strong> the Civil<br />
Rights Act [hereinafter Title II], which provides that, “All persons shall be entitled <strong>to</strong> the<br />
full and equal enjoyment <strong>of</strong> the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and<br />
accommodations <strong>of</strong> any place <strong>of</strong> public accommodation . . . without discrimination on the<br />
ground <strong>of</strong> race, color, religion, or national origin.” 146 <strong>The</strong> DOJ entered in<strong>to</strong> a settlement<br />
agreement with F & K, which specified that the establishment was required, in part, <strong>to</strong><br />
adopt a non-discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry dress code and apologize <strong>to</strong> Singh, his family, and <strong>to</strong> other<br />
<strong>Sikh</strong>s. 147 <strong>This</strong> appears <strong>to</strong> be a relatively “easy” case as the same individual who went <strong>to</strong> this<br />
venue was only denied entry after the terrorist attacks. <strong>The</strong> settlement agreement could<br />
serve as a benchmark regarding the seriousness with which such discrimination in places<br />
<strong>of</strong> public accommodation is viewed. However, cases involving turbaned <strong>Sikh</strong>s being<br />
142 See, e.g., <strong>Sikh</strong> American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Georgia Court<br />
Apologizes for Denying <strong>Sikh</strong> American Man Entrance <strong>to</strong> Court, available at<br />
http://www.saldef.org/content.aspx?a=1391.<br />
143 See, e.g., Sonja Sharp, Students Rail Scrutiny <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong>, THE DAILY CALIFORNIAN, Sept.<br />
24, 2004, available at http://www.dailycal.org/article.php?id=16228.<br />
144 See, e.g., Ralph Ranalli, <strong>Sikh</strong> student detained by Secret Service, BOSTON GLOBE, July<br />
30, 2004, available at<br />
http://www.bos<strong>to</strong>n.com/news/local/articles/2004/07/30/sikh_student_detained_by_secret<br />
_service/.<br />
145 DOJ Settlement Agreement, United States and F & K Management, Inc., d/b/a Hard<br />
Times Café and Santa Fe Cue Club, Feb. 28, 2003, available at<br />
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/legalinfo/discrimupdate.htm.<br />
146 42 U.S.C. § 2000a (2007).<br />
147 Id.<br />
27